Hudsons Land Case Analysis

Words: 633
Pages: 3

Before 1835, the Hudson's Bay Company had no formal system in Rupert's Land, making "courts" on an advert ad-hoc basis. The Hudson's Bay Company's "laws" within the seventeenth century and eighteenth centuries had been the laws subsidence out the principles governing the relationships between numerous workers within the company's posts in Rupert's Land and to move with the native peoples.The 1670 charter granting the corporate management of Rupert's Land had aforementioned trials were to conducted by the governor of Rupert's Land along with 3 of his councilors.there have been solely 3 cases before the nineteenth century with the one with the foremost careful notes being the trial of Thomas manservant in 1715 at the House of York mill UN agency was condemned of felony, slander, and fornication with a native girl. within the early nineteenth century, the HBC had waged a violent struggle with the rival North West Company based mostly in metropolis for the management of the fur trade culminating within the Seven Oaks massacre of 1816, that diode to associate degree investigation by the House of Commons, and that successively diode to the Second North American country Jurisdiction Act of 1821, ordering the Hudson's Bay Company to determine justice of the peace in Rupert's Land.rather than establishing courts, the corporate-directed the governor and …show more content…
A Recorder and President of the Court would act as legal organizer, adviser, magistrate, and member and be answerable for the rationalization and systematization of Rupert's Land judicatory. the primary Recorder was Adam Thom, UN agency control the post till 1854, though alleviated of most of his duties by his deputy some years before. He was succeeded as President of the Court from 1862 to 1870 by John