Human Cloning Controversy

Words: 615
Pages: 3

When mentioning the amendments within the United States constitution, one in particular comes to mind, and that is the 2nd amendment. The 2nd amendment is arguably the most controversial. Second to the 2nd amendment, in terms of controversy, is human cloning. Moreover, human cloning is the technique of producing a genetically identical duplicate of an organism by replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized ovum with the nucleus of a tissue cell from the organism, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary. The on-going discussion about human cloning consists of those who see it as a step further towards the future and those who view it as going against nature’s will. Those who support cloning humans have multiple reasons such as eliminating disorders and infertility, vast genetic modification, and more possible innovations for all of the world. On the other hand, cloning is seen by many as a violation of our human rights, unforeseen problems, interference with nature, and less genetic diversity. …show more content…
Cloning, basically, is the creation of life from an identical organism that already exists in the world. Some would express their opinion that it is “playing god”. Others would say the possibility of cloning human beings is not if, but when. Would we allow a cloned person the same rights compared to those who are born naturally? We do not know how human clones would be treated in the future, but we do know that not everyone, in this moment of time, is treated equally. In this current society, it is obvious that the American people still struggle with racism and diversity. Likewise, the government may promise that clones will not be abused or taken advantage of in any way, but people, including the United States government, do not always keep their promises. How do we know that bringing these “man-made” organisms into the world will not cause them to be exploited for personal benefits such as war or