Proof that Hyman Lubinski is guilty in the Lizzie Borden Case
If you were there the day of the Borden murder what would be the thing that catches your attention the most? Would it be a young woman who has fallen ill? Or would it be someone who’s going around looking into other people’s houses like a creepy stalker who’s up to no good? You see the problem is that everyone thinks that Lizzie killed her parents and it is important to discuss this due to the fact that there is more than one person that you can blame. Nowadays many people assume that people who stalk are the ones likeliest to commit a crime and most of the time it’s true and this is no exception to the matter. Hyman Lubinski is guilty due to certain thing soon to be discussed, continue if you dare.
To begin Hyman Lubinski is guilty, because One he says in his own words “I went to the house and looked in the windows and see people and I sell the cream.” which indicates the fact of poor manners. But that’s not why I say he is guilty that's my own personal complaint. Here’s why he’s guilty the fact that he looks into windows allows him to know whose home and the capability to strike when the pot’s hot.…show more content… When people do this it’s usually to take the topic off hand in which case the horse was the perfect thing to use to distract them. A little glimpse to show you what i mean. Questionnaire “Did you say a little while ago that you did put your horse up to dinner? Lubinski “I didn't say I put him up then. I told you I put my horse up.” Questionnaire “Did you put your horse up, or didn't you put your horse up?” Lubinski “You ask me too fast. I put my horse up for dinner.” this alone got the judge to stop and it made him look almost like an inaccurate witness, but at the time it would also make him a likely
