It is possible to say that people there are a difference between a member of society and a member of a team of workers. The difference lies in the professional and educational background of the individual and expectations that come from these backgrounds. In fact, the immigrants as human beings are treated well in Canada, they have the same rights as the citizens of the country, apart from being able to vote, they have the same access to the healthcare system, education, being able to marry and have children. Nonetheless, there is a huge difference for the immigrants to have theoretical opportunities to be employed and the actual ones that are present on the labor market. As a matter of fact, the immigrants have to face that their backgrounds – in this case, their accent – plays a significant role (Labour Market Barriers, 2017). The employer considers the ethnicity and the language barrier one might have inside a team of workers. The employer has certain prejudices against the immigrants when it comes to their ability to speak English and French. Even though their experience and educational background correlate with the position they apply for, still the employer might reject hiring them. Nonetheless, one of the weaknesses of the concept is a lack of analysis from a perspective of the employer and the …show more content…
Even though it is a multicultural country, still they do not possess the same power and social influence as the natives, which is understandable. However, the artificial limitations of their employment opportunities is based on the power of majority and the inability of immigrants to respond to it. White ontology has its own limitations as well. As a matter of fact, it sees the majority as a conventional institution that resist changes and would always oppress the minorities. Thus, the theory applies a certain scheme that puts its own limitations. For sure, there are exceptions and some employers hire immigrants instead of natives because of the skills they