Immigration Policy Summary

Words: 1498
Pages: 6

the standoff on changing the filibuster rues in the Senate in July 2013. McCain and Schumer further bonded during a trip to the Arizona-Mexico border, which senators Jeff Flake (R-AR) and Michael Bennet (D-CO), two other members of the gang, attended. Jeff Flake has long been known for his pro-immigration stance. Another reason for him to have joined the group might have been a consideration of his electoral future in Arizona, which has a large and increasing Hispanic population.
Michael Bennet was a perfect addition to the Gang, since he has been advocating for a sensible immigration reform in Colorado with help from former U.S. Sen. Hank Brown, a prominent Republican. The range of the backers of Colorado reform included faith organizations,
…show more content…
744 stated that if adopted, the law would provide a road to U.S. citizenship for as many as 11 million unauthorized immigrants, allocate billions for the militarization of the southern border and restructure the family-based immigration system. The bill also would create stringent enforcement and deportation measures and would ramp up workplace enforcement by mandating that employers use an electronic employment eligibility verification system. The Congressional Budget Office’s report showed that the bill was projected to grow the U.S. economy, and help reduce the deficit.
The bill was passed by the Senate by a vote of 68-32 on June 27, 2013, but the House of Representatives has not acted on this Senate bill, stalling the reform.
Although the House is unlikely to ever bring S.744 to the floor, the approval of this bill by the Senate is considered, as Ryan Lizza from the New Yorker put it: “an impressive bipartisan achievement for a legislative body that has long appeared hopelessly dysfunctional”. This bill serves as an example of how an urgent need for a solution to an problem of illegal immigration in the United States has forced all the policy actors to set aside their ideological differences and unite their efforts to create and implement a possibly historic (if enacted) piece of
…show more content…
during the Sixties and the Seventies of the last century continues today. The diversity of political, socioeconomic and cultural views in the country has led to the emergence of various movements and associations, each with their own objectives. A more recent tendency in Washington is growing corporate lobbying expenditures. Today, the biggest companies have upwards of 100 lobbyists representing them, allowing them a constant presence and influence on the policy process, especially on the stages of issue identification, agenda setting and policy making. Recent data shows that of the 100 organizations that spend the most on lobbying, 95 consistently represent