Imperialism Vs Colonization

Words: 264
Pages: 2

1. What differences existed between the two perspectives? Several different perspectives existed between the colonizers and the colonized. For starters, the colonizers felt they had a right to obtain land and use its resources while the colonized resented foreign presence. Frequently, the colonizers were viewed as tyrannical and oppressive by the inhabitants of the countries they conquered. Their lack of respect for the natives' culture and values caused animosity. However, in the colonizer's eyes, they were only helping to advance the countries into what they believed to be an ordered society.
2. What assumptions did the two groups make about each other?
Many assumptions were made by both parties in this battle of perspectives. The conquerors often concluded without significant reason that the citizens of conquered lands were ignorant, uncivilized, and quite primitive. They assumed that their impact on the nation would only be beneficial; despite the fact that before colonization many nations were already prosperous. This way of thinking caused the colonized people to resent the colonizers, presuming them as arrogant and dictating.
…show more content…
What methods were effective at acquiring and resisting power?
Various methods were effective at acquiring and resisting power. Indeed, using military force to suppress rivals was one of the best methods and proved to be very successful for many imperialist powers.Their strategic attacks, advanced weaponry, and strong alliances made them very hard to defeat. Nevertheless, with enough people rallying for the same cause resisting power was definitely possible as well. This method was demonstrated to be effective in several cases such as the Revolutionary War or the French