In Close Up Film Analysis

Words: 351
Pages: 2

The impact of cinema is immense beyond the human imagination. Cinema when it began was used as a vessel to transport people from their everyday and vigorous life. Through this, people were able to take on different perspectives and outlooks on various topics and events. Cinema ,ultimately, is a reflection of the filmmaker which influences society. The filmmaker is essentially the one chooses how the audience perceives the the movie. Films have a crucial effect on the world and illuminate topics which many governments and high officials would sweep under the rug. The films can venture to different places and various cultures that some viewers would not have access to. Filmmakers create scenes that will arouse the audience to begin questioning and discussing. Cinema is proven to have an effect because there are so many regulations. The films create a foundation for the …show more content…
Close Up allows two different socioeconomic backgrounds to cross paths because of one film. Cinema has the ability to break down boundaries of hierarchical structures. Cinema is an art form which many value in this film. The filmmakers possess the ability to distort the ending of the trial and the judgments. The recreation of the trial with characters playing themselves depicts the ability and rank of filmmakers. Filmmakers have to the ability to change events for the sole purpose of their taste and aesthetics. Sabzian displays the art side of film. It shows how art is influential in his lower class, just as the family he fools. The film has the ability to make a false reality. With the mixture of older and newer clips from the trial creates deception among the audience. This is similar to the Sabzian, he commits these acts for the arts. The audience can begin to question what is the difference between a brooding man in a court and a filmmaker and his/her