In Defense Of The Indians Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 565
Pages: 3

When native people were discovered in the New World by the Spanish, there was a huge debate about how to handle the treatment of the Indians. Although many considered degradation and domination to be the proper method, not all Spaniards approved the harsh, barbaric treatment of the Indians to make them convert to Christianity. A catholic missionary by the name of Bartolomé de Las Casas came forward and voiced his opinion. He voiced his opinion by saying, “Everything done to the Indians thus far was unjust and tyrannical”. In his book, In Defense of the Indians written in 1550, Las Casas again demonstrates his tendency towards treating the Indians fairly. He stated, “They are not ignorant, inhuman, or bestial”. Las Casas refuted the opinions of many, but most specifically Ginés Sepúlveda. Sepúlveda was a theologist and a royal historian who was firmly on the side of the harsh treatment of the Indians. The writing in Las Casas’ book appears to be a appeal to Spaniards to join together and stop the barbaric treatment of the indigenous people. …show more content…
First and foremost was the argument that the Indians are “not that barbaric, nor are they dull witted or stupid…”. He cited many examples of their learning capability, which made them great vessels for converting to Christianity. In addition, Las Casas championed the Indian people’s ability to develop government and culture. Las Casa stated, “They had properly organized states, wisely ordered by excellent laws, religion, and custom”. Las Casas continuously touted the inherent talent of the Indians, as well as, their