Indian Removal Act DBQ

Words: 533
Pages: 3

Would you like to always wear shoes that are way too small? That’s how the americans felt in georgia. They were all cramped up in their small territory in Georgia. For about a thousand years before the Georgians occupied Georgia, the Cherokee indians lived in the land that is now Northern Georgia. They created a very organized civilization with a written language, newspaper, and even written constitutions. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Cherokee were harmful to the Americans, the Americans wanted to expand more west, and the Cherokee were going to get more land than they originally had.

The Cherokee had been harmful to the Americans. The indians scalped Americans and killed them. The article, “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory” states, “Victims were scalped alive and even burned at the stake.” The Cherokee harmed the Americans. The Cherokee Indians also burned the Americans alive and slaughtered them. The article also stated, “The Cherokees ravaged American settlements in North and South Carolina, killing men, women and children.” The Cherokee people also were killed everyone. Although, the Americans started this brawl. The Americans backed out on trades or deals with the indians. Even though, technically the Indians harmed the Americans, the
…show more content…
Two words; Manifest Destiny. The Americans believed that god was telling them that they needed to expand their territory and move west. Georgians felt the need to be able to take over the Indians land. Georgians felt like they were too confined. They felt the urgent need to expand their territory. They felt like sardines in a can within their land. The Americans wanted more land, but they didn’t want to start any conflict with the Indians. Americans wanted to just barge in and take all of the Indian’s land, and that isn’t right. The Americans also wanted the moving of the Indians to be pretty