Insanity Defense and Mental Illness Essay examples

Submitted By PatriciaSmith215

Words: 311

Pages: 2

Open Document

What is the difference between mental illness and insanity? (Hint: What is the important second prong of the McNaughten rule?)
The difference between mental illness and insanity is the knowledge of right and wrong.
The McNaughten rule cannot be used to defend the actions of a person who drinks alcohol and then murders someone. Why not?
This rule cannot be used to defend the actions of a person who drinks too much then murders someone because that person made the choice to get that drunk. Someone who is mentally ill does not make the choice to be that way.
Identify each of the following:
Rational and guilty- That means the person knows the difference between right and wrong when they did the crime.
Guilty but insane- This is when someone is claiming to be insane at the time of the crime of the crime and is found guilty. Because this person has proven insanity there charge may consist of being committed to a psychiatric facility instead of prison.
Not guilty by reason of insanity- This is when someone is proven to be insane at the time in which they committed a crime and is therefore found not guilty. At the time of the crime they had no control over their actions.

If you were deciding this case, how would you rule? Briefly explain your decision.
If I were deciding this case I would rule not guilty by reason of insanity. I would rule this way because it was made clear to me that Clark was not in control of his actions at the time of the crime. Because of the timeline

Insanity Defense

The Insanity Defense What is the insanity plea? What was the M’Naghten case? These are questions lawyers and judges are often asked. Most people do not understand this area of law much at all. The insanity defense is widely misunderstood because of the ways somebody is diagnosed as insane, the differences between clinically and legally insane, and the defense attornies’ arguments often do not make it clear. There are small but distinct differences between the types of insanity. First there are…

Words 775 - Pages 4

The Implications of Insanity Defense Essay

implications of Insanity Defense Tirzah Lopez Psychology -101 Joan Rafter Hudson County Community College 12/5/2013 The Insanity Defense: implications Introduction When a court of law determines that a defendant is legally insane, it does not hold the defendant responsible for his actions. This defense is possible when an individual applies for an insanity defense. This places an argument that his actions were the result of a mental disorder during…

Words 1292 - Pages 6

Insanity Defense Essay

Insanity Defense: Support it or Abolish it? Should the United States of America keep or abolish the Insanity Defense? “In criminal trials, the insanity defenses are possible defenses by excuse, an affirmative defense by which defendants argue that they should not be held criminally liable for breaking the law because they were legally insane at the time of the commission of alleged crimes. A defendant attempting such a defense will often be required to undergo a mental examination…

Words 887 - Pages 4

Analysis Of Bonnie Richard's Essay: The Insanity Defense

essay, “The insanity defense: proposals for reform, she explains why the insanity defense should not be abolished. She asserts that the defense should just be narrowed for its administration. Richard’s purpose is to argue that the removal of the insanity defense would not be an ethically permissible act of the criminal law. Richard states that if a person did not understand the wrongfulness of their actions during the offense, then they should not be punished. The people with mental disorders should…

Words 733 - Pages 3

Insanity: Evolving Insanity Defense Essay

In the United States, criminals are innocent until proven guilty. There are opportunities in the criminal justice system where several defenses have been build into the system that can be used to lessen a sentence or to negate guilt due to a mental state. But why do we offer such things to people who have done such harm? Criminal Law is societies contract with itself. It governs what people can and cannot do, what happens when they do break that law and what appropriate punishment fits the crime…

Words 1733 - Pages 7

Insanity Defense Research Paper

Whitney Gonsalves Mrs. Dalton English Language Arts 12, Hour 5 31 October 2016 Rough Draft Is the insanity plea a valid one in criminal cases and what kind of assessment could be used to prove a person is criminally insane? The insanity defense states that a criminal is not guilty by reason of insanity. The theory is that the criminal either did not know the act was wrong or cannot control their violent actions even when they understand that what they did was wrong. This theory is also controversial…

Words 1414 - Pages 6

The Insanity Defense

The insanity defense is a subject many Americans know little about. The insanity defense is referred to the criminal’s state of mind at the time of the offense. The offenders mental illness lacks moral responsibility and liability for the crime committed. The clinical psychologist needs to look into the past of the offender for traces of hospitalization and history of violence. A psychologist cannot determine if an offender is clinically insane because that is the legal definition. A mentally ill…

Words 1146 - Pages 5

mind over matter Essay

A Mind over Matter Questions April Davis PSY/270 Dr. Andrew Graham August 21, 2014 1. What is the difference between mental illness and insanity? Someone can have a mental illness yet not be insane. For instance, a schizophrenic can be medicated and in therapy and not be considered insane. Insanity does not know the difference between right and wrong. Insanity is not being lucid enough to know what you are doing. 2. The McNaughten rule cannot be used to defend the actions of a person who…

Words 561 - Pages 3

Insanity Defense Research Paper

Not guilty by reason of insanity has perplexed the most qualified legal and psychiatric professionals for centuries. The insanity defense is rooted in the belief that when a person is so mentally disturbed that their irrationality or compulsion is impossible to control, it would be unfair to punish them in such an extreme condition (4). This beginning the argument of is the mental health of an individual more important than them paying for their crimes. The insanity defense has become a media sensation…

Words 597 - Pages 3

The American Sniper: The Eddie Ray Routh Case

Another example of where the insanity plea did not work was in the Eddie Ray Routh case, where he shot “The American Sniper” Chris Kyle and Chad Littlefield. On February 2, 2013, when Chris and his friend Chad Littlefield, were shot at a gun range outside of a gun range at Forth Worth, Texas by Eddie Routh. Eddie Routh was 38-year old, ex-marine who had a long history of mental illness. During his trial, defense attorneys said that Routh was insane at the time of the wrongful act. On February 24…

Words 299 - Pages 2