Into The Wild Analysis Essay

Words: 701
Pages: 3

In the book, Into the Wild, written by Jon Kraukuer, Krauker tells the tale of a daring individual who is in search of the real meaning of life. This man is known as Chris McCandless. Chris rebelled against society and journeyed to Alaska, where he survived in the wild for 113 days before he passed away. To this day, people ponder whether or not this was a good decision and if Chris really did find the bliss he was desperately looking for in the wild. Krauker writes, “ McCandless didn’t conform particularly well to the bush-casualty stereotype. Although, he was rash, untutored in the ways of the backcountry, and incautious to the point of foolhardiness, he wasn’t incompetent -- he wouldn’t have lasted 113 days if he were. And he wasn’t a nutcase, he wasn’t a sociopath, he wasn’t an outcast . McCandless was something else -- although precisely what is hard to say. A pilgrim, perhaps.” I believe that Chris McCandless was not crazy; he was merely a dedicated explorer searching for his purpose. Evidently, McCandless found that purpose in nature. Therefore, Chris did discover what he was searching for before he died. …show more content…
But, what is so wrong with pursuing your dream? Joseph Larovara states “A lot of people say that he was suicidal, however it was his dream that ended up leading to his death. If you think about it though, it is better to have lived and died after achieving your dream rather than living without following your dreams. I think that is the reason why Chris McCandless seemed so accepting of death at the end of his journey.” McCandless died as a happy man because he felt like he was where he belonged. He had accomplished his goals of making it to Alaska. Although he did not survive as long as he planned, he endured 113 days of learning to cope with new, unknown territory. It is extremely impressive how far Chris came on his journey and that is why he was accepting of his