Invasion Of Privacy

Words: 531
Pages: 3

Who else is against not only school officials but as well as police officers taking phones from people and searching through them for evidence? Despite the good evidence in a few of these paragraphs, they do not have the right to unexpectedly search through someone's private property. Officials should not be able use information they collect from private devices and/or social networking sites in order to “protect” the community.

Officials should not be able to look through peoples phones because it is an extensive invasion of privacy. If a student posts an inappropriate picture or comment, the schools should contact parents and let them manage it, instead of demanding to look through phones than suspending the student. “Schools do not have the right to monitor what students do online outside of
…show more content…
A Teacher's job is to teach the students in school. If a student is on her phone during class yes a teacher can take it away, but they should not and do not have the right for a password and an unnecessary search through the phone. Even though cops enforce the law, that is not a free invitation to look through an arrestee's phone and invade their privacy. Officers shouldn’t go against the fourth amendment, “protecting citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.” Police officers open and examine what they find on an arrested person, without a warrant. A warrant is permission from a judge based on reasonable suspicion. There isn’t a big difference between searching a phone and searching a home. A phone can even have more personal information in it. Policemen abuse the “right” to search through an arrestee's phone. If cops pull someone over and find drugs they can’t take that person's phone and search through it without asking for permission. Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar says, “Cops should have to obtain a warrant. It is