Investigatory Powers Debate

Words: 1266

Pages: 6

Open Document

Thank you for contacting me about intelligence oversight, our right to privacy and the draft Investigatory Powers Bill. I appreciate your concerns about protecting personal privacy, which is why I am pleased, as Theresa May outlined in her statement last week, as well as improving investigatory powers for our intelligence agencies and authorities, this Bill will increase intelligence oversight by asking a judge to approve all warrants to intercept data, even if already signed off by the Home Secretary.

The dangerous work that our intelligence agencies do for us by confronting the diverse and very real terrorist threat this country continues to face every single day is so important in keeping us all safe. In the past twelve months alone …show more content…
We will also be creating a powerful and independent Investigatory Powers Commissioner. This will be a senior judge who will be supported by a team of expert inspectors with the authority and resources effectively, and visibly, to hold the intelligence agencies and law enforcement to account – showing that we will be world-leading with these oversight arrangements in place, whilst also respecting peoples’ rights to privacy.

I am positive that our surveillance and security is tightly regulated and scrutinised in this country, protecting both the right to privacy as well as the national security of the UK as a whole. The balance between these two things is key in maintaining the trust of the public and the safety of every member of our community and I am confident this will be maintained. As we are reminded time and time again by terrorists, this not an abstract debate but rather a very real question of how we can give ourselves the best chance of preventing attacks and saving

War On Terror Essay

and check carry-on luggage. Congress passed the USA patriot Act one month after the attacks. It was signed into law with little debate because it seemed the right thing to do at the time to make policy changed to help fight the war on Terror. The purpose of the act is to be able to prevent and punish terrorist acts in the United Stated, improve law enforcement investigatory tools. The act was also made to strengthen the U.S measures to prevent, detect, and prosecute international money laundering and…

Words 766 - Pages 4

Internet and the Law Essay

including PRISM and Tempora; both are surveillance programmes designed by the United States and United Kingdom Governments as a way of intercepting data. In recent years, the debate over surveillance and privacy has been heightened through the exposure of secret State documents and the programmes they are using. The debate argues two main points; firstly, the Government believe that the surveillance of all citizens is necessary, and secondly, the public believe surveillance to be in breach of their…

Words 3029 - Pages 13

Discrimination and National Origin Essay

“EEOC”, to implement this law. The EEOC, as an independent regulatory body, plays a major role in dealing with different issues when it comes to women’s equal rights. Since its creation in 1964, Congress has gradually extended EEOC powers to include investigatory authority, creating conciliation programs, filing lawsuits, and conducting voluntary assistance programs. Today, according to the “U. S. Government Manual of 1998-99”, the EEOC enforces laws that prohibit discrimination based on race…

Words 1654 - Pages 7

Essay about Chapter 5

Edgardo Cruz Professor Lloyd Gaddis 04/03/14 Govt. 2306 Chapter 5: The Politics of Interest Groups Models of Democracies; A. The majoritarian model holds that the government should do what the majority of the public wants; B. Pluralistic model argues that the public as a whole seldom shows clear, consistent opinions on public issues; Democracy is at work when the opinions of these groups clash openly and fairly over government policies; This model is more relevant to the United States; a. This…

Words 5476 - Pages 22

nothing ishere Essay

392 U.S. 1 (1968), the United States Supreme Court ruled that reasonable suspicion requires specific, articulable, and individualized suspicion that crime is afoot. A mere guess or "hunch" is not enough to constitute reasonable suspicion. An investigatory stop is a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The state must justify the seizure by showing that the officer conducting the stop had a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. The important point is that officers cannot…

Words 3228 - Pages 13

Essay on First Amendment to the United States Constitution and u . s . Supreme Court

Significant historical events, court cases, and ideas that have shaped our current system of constitutional First Amendment jurisprudence: 1215 Abuses by England’s King John cause a revolt by nobles, who compel him to recognize rights for both noblemen and ordinary Englishmen. This document, known as the Magna Carta, establishes the principle that no one, including the king or a lawmaker, is above the law, and establishes a framework for future documents such as the Declaration of Independence…

Words 7937 - Pages 32