Invisible Man Literary Analysis

Words: 1330
Pages: 6

During biblical times, Adam and Eve were exiled from the Garden of Eden after disobeying God by eating fruit from the tree of knowledge. Though their punishment was both embarrassing and devastating as they were leaving their plentiful and beautiful homeland, it allowed them fully understand the responsibility and pain associated with knowledge and the importance of trusting their creator. By facing something horrible that shattered life as they knew it, they emotionally matured and gained reasoning behind their morals. In Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible Man,” the protagonist experiences exile academically, professionally, and politically: while on the surface, this is a blow to his pride, he eventually learns that being banned from these organizations …show more content…
Brother Jack scolds the narrator and offers the ultimatum of “either [accepting] discipline, or [getting] out,” just after his “buttermilk white eye distorted by light rays” (475) pops out. A “buttermilk white eye” provides an image of a bright and pure white, connecting to the color of Jack’s skin. However, since it is “distorted by the light rays,” this optic image proves that Jack’s perception is completely clouded as a result of societal white-washing. The idea that white people are the best race and should hold all power is society is so ubiquitous, that it hinders Jack’s ability to consider the perspective of others. Not only is he literally blind with his glass eye, but he is figuratively blind to the needs of people looked down upon in society: He is unable to see past skin color. These “light rays” come as an epiphany to the narrator, for it is the moment he realizes he is only being used as a black man to make the organization seem as if it is pro-equality when in reality, it is corrupt and abuses people like the protagonist to climb its way to the top. In addition, this ultimatum is enlightening to the narrator, for that is when he realizes he should not be following orders if they are unjust and suppress his ability to make personal decisions. “Getting out” is perhaps the better option when the freedom of thought is on the line. The protagonist learns that it is not worth it to join the bandwagon just to feel a part of something and adopt a purpose. Purpose is internal: It is evoked by having the ability to think for oneself, for that makes it possible for thinking to become profound and enriched by diverse perspectives, which in turn leads to societal advancement. Though his skepticism, the