Is George Justified In Of Mice And Men

Words: 520
Pages: 3

An example of an important moral to humans is to not commit murder. This moral was broken in the novel, Of Mice Of Men. George killed Lennie after Curley launched a wild hunt to kill Lennie for murdering his wife. I believe that George’s actions weren’t justified.

There are various alternatives, such as running away with Lennie to a place where they could both live safely under the radar. In the beginning of the novel, George and Lennie escape from the Weed after another hunting is made after Lennie for touching a woman’s dress. This is evidence that this wouldn’t be the first time of George and Lennie escaping near death. Some might vocalize that they barely ran away without being captured, but in the story, George and Lennie hide right
…show more content…
In the book, Curly is directioning everyone’s aggression at Lennie, but some still thought killing Lennie was over the boundaries. Some might say that no one would have assisted George, in fear of Curley’s wrath. In the story, George had already been presented by the people that no one honestly liked Curley because of his hostile behavior. In this fragile moment, George could’ve manipulated the people to help protect Lennie, but he selfishly thought of how he felt in the story and decided to kill him. George’s intelligence wasn’t ever in question. He made this choice because he no longer wanted to take care of Lennie.

In conclusion, George's actions weren’t justified because he didn’t attempt to revolt against Curley’s authority, hide Lennie somewhere safe with Candy, or steal money and escape to live on their land alone. The audience questions if George’s actions couldn’t have been justified, but this evidence presents against those claims. The human morals of not killing another human were broken in the novel, Of Mice Of Men and his actions are crimes and won’t be