Judge Stephen Walking Vs Harvey

Words: 629
Pages: 3

Crimes committed: Breaking and entering, aggravated assault.

Defendant gumshoe 40 yr old Was a detective for 20 years now a retired worker who helps around the neighborhood.

Judge Stephen Walking was a top Harvard-educated lawyer recently elected to be a judge. There is no correlation to somebody named Stephen Hawking.

Defense Attorney Phoenix Wright: A lawyer fresh out of law school ready to make his mark on the world with not much experience but very capable.

Prosecuting attorney Harvey Specter: Harvey Specter was a lawyer from a small town in Minnesota who wanted to move back and start his firm.

Jury members

Bailiff Sheriff Bill Fence Started a tech company called Glass but got beat out by another little-known tech company called
…show more content…
Judge Stephen Walking: defense of any opening statements.

Defense attorney Phoenix Wright: We will prove that defendant Gumshoe is not guilty so we wish for a verdict of not guilty.

Judge Stephen Walking: Prosecution. You may call your first witness up to the stand.

Prosecutor Harvey Specter: We call Jimmy Ross to the stand.

Judge Stephen walking: Jimmothy Ross may you please come up to the stand *jimmothy walks up to the stand and sits down.

Prosecutor Harvey Specter: Would you please tell us your account of what happened?

Jimmothy Ross: I was at home when I heard somethin’ in the other room when I saw him I shouted “Who are you! !” Then he said huh and punched me as I screamed hitting the floor. I caught a glimpse of him as he ran away and I knew that face anywhere. ”

Prosecutor Harvey Specter: “Who was it” Prosecutor Harvey Specter interrupts.

Jimmy Ross: “Why it was Mr. Gumshoe”

Prosecutor Harvey Specter: That’s enough Mr. Ross.

Judge Stephen Walking: Would the defense like to cross-examine?

Defense Attorney Phoenix Wright: We Would Your