Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 835

Pages: 4

Open Document

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the power of persuasion takes center stage as Mark Antony and Brutus address the Roman crowd in the aftermath of Caesar's assassination. Through the use of rhetorical devices such as repetition and rhetorical questions, Antony strives to sway the people's opinion regarding the conspirators. Meanwhile, Brutus employs his own rhetorical ability to justify the assassination, relying heavily on appeals to ethos. These speeches provide a fascinating study of the art of persuasion in a political context, showing the importance of rhetorical persuasion. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses repetition and rhetorical questions to convey to the people of Rome that the conspirators were not thinking for the …show more content…
Utilizing Brutus' status in such a manner lets Antony kill two birds with one stone. First, it disproves, outlandish claims, and secondly devalues Brutus’s status, or at least forces the Romans to think twice about accepting Brutus’s honor. Later, during his supposed praise of Brutus, Antony notes an observation he made of Caesar previously. “When the poor have cried, Cesar hath wept; Ambition should be made of sterner stuff. Yet Brutus says he is an ambitious man. And sure he is an honorable man” Act 3 Scene 2 lines 100-102 Yet again Antony uses repetition to directly conflict with the evidence he provides in Caesar's favor. This real-world example, conflicting with Brutus' supposed honor, which is now crumbling in the minds of the Roman crowd, helps sway the crowd more to Antony’s side. Mark Antony also makes use of rhetorical questions to prove Caesar's innocence and help the crowd see the

Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar

Rhetoric is a superpower, one that can be used for one’s own advantage or for the good of others. Antony’s best friend, Julius Caesar, has been betrayed by his acquaintances and even by his best friend Brutus. Antony’s dreads for justice, now at the funeral of Caesar he awaits his chance to speak the truth through the power of rhetoric. Antony speaks of Brutus being an honest and humble man and talks as well of the others who also betrayed him. Accordingly he says the following “Here under leave…

Words 567 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

manipulating people to kill several men? In the play Julius Caesar, author William Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos, and logos to present the arguments of the characters contained inside the story. Shakespeare used ethos to convince the audience of the arguments presented inside of the story. Shakespeare wrote that Antony stated “He was my friend, faithful and just to me,” showing that Antony is trying to convince the audience, through ethos, that Caesar was a good, loyal person. Shakespeare also wrote…

Words 416 - Pages 2

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Throughout Julius Caesar, there are many uses of rhetoric, but it is none the more evident during the funeral speeches given by Brutus and Antony. While both men were able to get their point across to the people, Antony was able to indefinitely sway the roman people to his side. A reason for this could be because Brutus allows Anthony to say the last words, but Antony’s use of ethos, logos, and pathos far outclasses Brutus’. Ethos, an appeal to credibility is used by both, an example of when Brutus…

Words 647 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

over his or her audience. Successfully utilizing rhetoric leads the audience to accept the message that is being conveyed, which gives the speaker power over the listeners. William Shakespeare, the author of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar expresses the idea that a person’s rhetorical skills directly influence their power over others by displaying the control certain people have over the general public, the effect rhetoric has within friendships, and how the use of rhetoric affects romantic relationships…

Words 1310 - Pages 6

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

an event when someone was betrayed and killed by their best friend? In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Caesar was betrayed and killed by his best friend Brutus and the conspirators. After the war with Pompeii (a general), citizens of Rome label Caesar as a hero and lots of people support Career. Brutus and the other conspirators are planning to kill Caesar because Caesar is getting too much power (citizen’s support). Caesar is kill at the lupercal by Brutus and the conspirators. After Caesar’s…

Words 1228 - Pages 5

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Ambition drives us everyday, and to some extent it is ok, but there is a point to which you need to be stopped, and that is what Brutus and Cassius saw in Caesar. This resulted in them killing him as a sacrifice for the good of Rome. Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar’s, now wants revenge on the conspirators, and to do that he is going to use his way of word to rally the commoners. Initially, Antony seems to be understanding of the conspirators, but when the funeral starts, you can see a swift change…

Words 539 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony gives a speech of ethics, emotion and reason to convince the people of Rome to turn against the conspirators. Antony gives this speech in the town square of Rome after the death of Julius Caesar. Antony uses a confrontational tone accompanied with a judgmental attitude because he is attempting to persuade the people of Rome to disregard the words of Brutus and to move against the conspirators. Antony uses ethical, emotional…

Words 668 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Act 1

He demonstrates to Casca who Julius Caesar really is and how his plans of taking over Rome might result in destroying the government. In this speech, Caesar is compares to many things using figurative language such as : EXPLAIN OK. Also, not only Cassius’s character is shown but he describes Casca as a person who has the ability to do something…

Words 338 - Pages 2

Trajedy of Julius Caesar Essay

of Wisdom: A Rhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Speech After hearing lie after lie from Marcus Brutus, Mark Antony addresses the people of Rome in an ironic manner implying that Brutus lies. When speaking to the people of Rome, Antony creates havoc amongst the crowd over the truth behind Julius Caesar’s death. Antony opens his speech by justifying his reason to address the people of Rome. Antony uses antithesis to address the people of Rome of his intention: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise…

Words 718 - Pages 3

Letter To Philippians Analysis

is no compelling reason to overturn the early tradition that Paul wrote Philippians from Rome.“ There are a couple explanations for this; first, as a Roman citizen, Paul could not be legally executed away from Rome—he had the right of appeal to Caesar, so “if the death he feared when he wrote Philippians was death by execution (rather than by illness), then he must have been imprisoned in Rome and nowhere else.” Second, references to the “praetorium” and to “Caesar’s household” are best understood…

Words 1928 - Pages 8