Justice In 12 Angry Men

Words: 643

Pages: 3

Open Document

The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose exemplifies the chaos that goes on in the justice system. In this drama, the life of a young teen is placed in the hands of twelve jurors. While analyzing this heart-rending murder case, these men undergo feelings of frustration, rage, and exasperation as they discuss a murder trial. The twelve jurors become frustrated with juror eight because he, initially, is the only person opposed in the decision of the case. The jurors elaborate continue to vote on the verdict. However, each time they cannot come to a unanimous decision. This is due to the fact that juror eight is set on proving why this case has many inconsistencies with evidence.
Throughout the drama, juror eight questions the validity of statements made by the people who are serving as witnesses for the case. For instance, the old man who lived downstairs from where the murder took …show more content…
This play exemplifies how decisions in the justice system can be based off of serotypes. Some of the jurors referred to the teen as different class of people. Even though the race of the defendant is not stated, it is safe to assume he is a part of a social class that is look down upon due to statements from the members of the jury. In today’s society people characterize people based off of gender, race, or religion. For example, it is rumored that all African American women wear weaves, or all Muslims are terrorists. This exemplifies how people can make irrational decisions based on stereotypes places on a certain group of people. Even though jurors are supposed to be non-biased, their feelings about a situation can alter their opinion. This is one of the sole reasons why there are flaws in the justice system. It is safe to say that many people have been wrongfully accused of a crime they did not committed due to biased jurors. I personally believe that this fault in the judicial system would be extremely difficult to

Justice In 12 Angry Men

Law is a system of rules that govern citizens of a country,city,and state. Justice is fairness in the way people are treated. Revenge is something an individual does in order to punish someone who has armed or offended another. These terms are the focus in four stories, Deathwatch, Twelve Angry Men, Murder On The Orient Express and Ox-Bow Incident. Together these stories present the universal truth which is justice is a product of law. A civilization without law is merely a state of nature. Robb…

Words 689 - Pages 3

To Kill A Mockingbird Pride And Prejudice Analysis

Reginald roses twelve angry men are unfair to society and the individual as a whole. The social rules restrict interaction and treatment of equality to different social classes and races. This is shown in twelve harper lees To Kill a Mockingbird in the conviction and trial of tom Robinson were he was wrongfully convicted because of his colour and the social exclusion and demise of Mayella Ewell and how she is forced to commit a crime that is recognisably unnoticed. In 12 angry this perception is taken…

Words 1057 - Pages 5

Essay about Mr MM goes to the MM

Justice Speech. English. Good morning/afternoon class and sir/miss. Most people would accept that justice should be the aim of any legal system. Never the less, some legal systems exist without any apparent notion of justice. One only has to think of the totalitarian regimes in Iraq under Saddam and in Russia under Stalin, where the law was simply a means of repression, not a means of doing justice. The word justice appears in many of the United States’ most important documents, including the…

Words 669 - Pages 3

'Guilty In Reginald Roes's Twelve Angry Men'

Roes's "Twelve Angry Men".It sets in on a court hearing where 12 jurors have to decide whether or not a young man is guilty for manslaughter. The piece only shows the jurors in the room where they stay for awhile because they can not come up with an agreement. Eventually after virtual arguements and lots of talking they decide that the young nineteen year old kid is not guilty. Reginald Roses piece of "Twelve Angry Men" can be interpreted of a purpose of showing us that not all justice systems can be…

Words 319 - Pages 2

gabbys essays

Gabrielle Brooks Sophomore Thesis March 17, 2013 Period 6 For many years the criminal justice system has been responsible for prosecuting and sentencing many of America’s citizens. Often times those who are prosecuted do not get a fair trial. The jury system is often biased and prejudiced depending on the accused and this is one of the causes for the many flaws and disputes in our system. The outcomes of the prosecuted can turn for the better and other times, for the worse. People often misjudge…

Words 985 - Pages 4

Twelve Angry Men Essay

others". Twelve Angry Men is more than a play, it is a reminder of our social responsibility. Discuss. Twelve Angry Men is a legal drama, written by Reginald Rose during the heightened period of 1950's McCarthyism. The didactic play presents a cross section, examining 1950's America during a period of immense suspicion and uncertainty. Roses' play reminds us of the importance of responsibility and integrity, emphasising qualities such as courage that aid in preserving justice. The play examines…

Words 1237 - Pages 5

Jurors In 12 Angry Men

In 12 Angry Men, a young adult of eighteen years old was accused of killing his own father. Twelve jurors had to decide whether the young adult was innocent or guilty. The punishment was going to be the death penalty if he were guilty. It took three hours for the twelve jurors to come to the conclusion. At first, it was eleven to one, who thought that the boy was at fault, but at the end, the twelve men concluded that the young boy was innocent. They came to this conclusion by going over facts really…

Words 1655 - Pages 7

Social Justice In 12 Angry Man

percent of the world’s, yet we have almost 25 percent of the world’s total prison population” (2015). As I watched the movie of 12 angry man I realized that the faith of the 18-year-old boy is in hands of 12 men. I noticed that while watching the movie, majority of the jury came to the decision that the 18-year-old was guilty of his father’s murder. However, one out of the 12 juror Henry Fonda, had his reservations about the case as he considered the boy’s fate. He knew that a decision cannot be based…

Words 658 - Pages 3

Rugmaker: Juror Essay

in ’12 Angry Men’? Discuss Reginald Rose conveys a tainted society, where truth is contaminated by irrationality and ignorance, and justice is repressed by prejudice and egotistical motive. The fragile bias state of the American Justice System is exploited, and the warped, bigoted condition of society is exposed, as a 1957 New York jury is forced to decide the fate of a young, delinquent on trial for the murder of his hostile father, on a coinciding ‘hot summer afternoon’. ‘Twelve Angry Men’ exhibits…

Words 1258 - Pages 6

Rationalism In 12 Angry Men

The 12 Angry Men was an interesting movie to watch. There are several Philosophical positions it has. I believe three of the theories of Rationalism, Reasoning, Empiricism and Duty and Justice is a good Philosophical position for this film. Human being needs all of them to accomplish what they are after. Archiving the knowledge with reason and requiring the knowledge through experience along the lines. Adding the sense of justice and duty depending on their moral ideas. Thought-out the movie, they…

Words 377 - Pages 2