for that person. Respect is a way of following Kant’s Humanity Formula of the Categorical Imperative. A Kantian analysis on the subject of respect is to treat rational beings as valuable and not as objects for self gratification. There are moral laws that define humanity and respect is an essential law that keeps rational beings trustworthy of one another. If an individual I respect commits an immoral act, it proves dishonoring the moral law of humanity, which alters my ability to maintain respect…
Words 495 - Pages 2
The good will allows us to become moral agents. The ability for the good will is the moral aspect of human rationality. Moral agents are rational agents. Since we are rational agents, we cannot will rationally to act in the face of the moral law. Kant’s claims may be divided into the claim of moral psychology and the claim of moral value. The claim of moral psychology: People are capable of being motivated by their beliefs about duties (under the moral law). The claim of moral value: Only good will…
Words 1307 - Pages 6
Throughout history philosophers have been entranced with the concept of morality. They have searched for the formula solving what motivates and creates human morality. In his book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant theorizes an absolute and universal guide based on the principle of reason to determine what humans morally ought to do— the categorical imperative. The categorical imperatives consists of different formulations, which simply act as different ways of defining it. At…
Words 1705 - Pages 7
Kant's Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals is an exploration and argument that seeks a universally binding first principle for morals. Kant presents an essay in which empirical observations and facts are not adequate to answer the question of, why be moral? Instead Kant relies on theoretical concepts, such as autonomy, morality, duty and goodwill to explain how necessity and causality are ordered. In this essay I will attempt to explain the Kantian connection between freedom and morality. In…
Words 2235 - Pages 9
practical rationality The use of reason to determine what actions one should perform. what actions one should perform? what makes an action good? or more specifically what makes an action practically rational? Should I skip class, because I am doing well. Kant asked what makes an action good or what makes an action practically rational what to do, what action is need for some goal. According to Kan'ts moral philosophy, it is defined as the capacity of a rational being to act according to principles…
Words 4122 - Pages 17
Talking about Kant’s philosophical ideas is both straightforward and comprehensively complex. Kant utilizes the rational capabilities that humans (rational beings) have to determine whether an action is morally right or wrong. This is a bit vague but Kant has established…
Words 1489 - Pages 6
1804. Kant observed the world around him and observed that that every culture religion and society has moral law whether they are obeyed or not. The Formula of Universal Law- Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law. The Formula of Humanity- Act so that you use humanity, whether in your own person or that of another, always at the same…
Words 1659 - Pages 7
morality of an action is the societal response to said action (societal meaning those outside of your own being). Kant's system uses the two formulations of the categorical imperative to place importance upon society, while Mill uses the concept of “the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people”. In my eyes, this is pretty much where the similarities stop, though. Kant's system is based around pure reason that is…
Words 2182 - Pages 9
Kant’s final and complete formulation of the categorical imperative Kant believed on actions like murder, theft, and lying are illegal and are not required even in cases where an action brings more happiness than the alternative. The categorical imperative is there to give a way for individuals to have an evaluation of moral actions and to make moral judgments. And this is not a command to do specific actions. In simple terms it is a formal procedure by which evaluation of any action about which…
Words 931 - Pages 4
This reading, according to Steinberger, is unpersuasive in a couple of ways. Firstly, Steinberger realizes that the moral law is not guided by the mere logical consistence. Steinberger reviews Harrison’s argument that the maxim of breaking promises , if universalized, undermine the systematic harmony of purposes. Since such result is based on experience of breaking promises. Kemp argues that Kant indicates self-contradiction in the CI is essentially logical. Steinberger takes Harrison’s point is…
Words 7178 - Pages 29