Kello V. New London Case Summary

Words: 1776
Pages: 8
Open Document
Kelo V. New London: Using eminent domain, The city of New London, Connecticut, took the property of private owners in order to sell it to larger companies that would develop the property. This would be an advantage for the city, but the land owners challenged the 5th amendment. They said that the Takings Clause gave them assurance that the government would not take any private property for public use without ample and fair compensation. The property owners said that taking the property and selling said property to developers was not directly public use. The legal issue is a question of whether the City of New London is violating the 5th Amendments Taking Clause when they take private property from landowners and sell it for private development. While their intentions are to have the new developments enhance the city and give jobs and more opportunity, it is not guaranteed to help the economy as they are aiming for.
The holding of this case there was a 5-4 decision, and the majority states that it is not a violation to take this land for these reasons. The Takings clause does protect New London’s actions, and the land owners are not able to keep their properties from being seized.
The majority in this case by Stevens, says …show more content…
This term should not be just used to it’s literal meaning, of those serving in the military. At the time this was referenced, all men whom were able to serve, were subject to being drafted. Limiting the right to “bear arms” to only those in a such position is the opposite of what it is meant to be. This amendment was put in place to protect people and guarantee some persons right to carry a weapon for self defense purposes. The banning and restricting of handguns and keeping people from ease of access to self defense is violating citizen’s
Show More

Related Documents: Kello V. New London Case Summary

Kello V. New London Case Summary

The Supreme Court case I have chosen is Kelo v. New London, Connecticut. This case was heard in 2005. The facts of the case involve the Fifth Amendment taking clause and eminent domain land rights. A private landowner named Susette Kelo was offered an amount of money by the city of New London, Connecticut to use her property. Other pieces of land were bought and were being used to build a pharmaceutical facility adjacent to the Trumbull neighborhood. The city had told her that the land in question…

Words 2600 - Pages 11