King Andrew Jackson Being An Effective Leader Essay

Words: 474
Pages: 2

Being an effective or ineffective leader should not be judged on if the actions were morally correct or not, but how the leader effected others. Jackson had thin skin and took everything way too personal. Jackson was not an effective leader because he never took anyone's advice and always did things his own way. Jackson also valued the position more than he did his actual job. Jackson messed up ample amounts during his presidency. For one, the Indian Removal Act was detrimental to their population and history, Jackson had a horrible temper and was known to fight at the drop of a hat. Being an effective leader is not fighting everyone and being racist and killing off thousands of people. Jackson loved money and power, had a short temper, never took anyone's advice and treated people as if they were less than him; he was a very ineffective leader.
Document E shows a political cartoon of Jackson in king’s attire with captions around it saying ‘born to command’, ‘King Andrew the first’, ‘of veto memory’ and, ‘had i been consulted’. Jackson was referred
…show more content…
Jackson wanted to raise the tariffs which triggered the “South Carolina’s Ordinance of Nullification of 24 November 1832, declaring the tariffs acts null, void and not binding upon her” (T). John C. Calhoun kind of whispered to S. Carolina about the nullification Proclamation telling them it was still available. When Jackson found out about
Calhoun causing this issue he promised Calhoun if he ever found him he would kill him right on the spot.
Jackson was a very flawed man and he was very hard-headed. Jackson killed thousands and thousands of people, not to mention his temper. Document E.1 shows Jackson on the back of a pig riding money which is a very valid representation of Jackson's presidency. He was an ineffective leader because he took things too close to heart and did his own thing in