Essay about King or President of the United States?

Submitted By theeasywayout1413
Words: 1405
Pages: 6

One of the most unique aspects of the American government is the concept of rules, and citizen rulers. What is an amendment? An amendment is simply a minor change in a document, for example when congress wants to pass a new law or add onto a law, which is considered an amendment. One amendment that many people question regularly is the twenty-second amendment for various reasons. This document states “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.” Many people argue that the twenty-second amendment is anti-democratic, denying the nation the chance to keep a successful president in office. While other people feel that this amendment is the greatest thing to have thinking that if the twenty-second amendment was repealed it would allow presidents to take advantage of their power to keep off all challengers past the two-term limit. What would be the best possible outcome with the best results if the nation decided to either keep the twenty-second amendment, or repeal it and get rid of it indefinitely? In the article, “No More Second-Term Blues” by author James Macgregor and Susan Dunn, they explain their opinion as to why the twenty-second amendment should be repealed and taken out of the constitution. Going deeper into the article Macgregor states that. “A second term president will, in effect, automatically be fired within four years.” This statement is true, It has led me to believe that after a president's first term in office, they tend not to care too much after that knowing there time in office is ending shortly. Another reason the authors give as to why the twenty-second amendment should be repealed is campaign fundraising. Macgregor states, “Presidential incumbents already have a significant advantage, but not necessarily and overwhelming one, especially with campaign finance reform.” Money can sometimes play a big role in the political world as in if you’re running for president. Someone who would be running up against the current president would be a big challenge, considering they already have the experience in office and they also have the money to back their campaign as to why they should be kept in office for another term. In comparison to that, Macgregor says, “And Democrats, contemplate the century that lies ahead, can hope that in another world crisis, this amendment will not be there to bar a future Franklin Roosevelt from offering the kind of leadership that he provided in the 1940’s”. From what the authors of this article have composed and put into writing, it seems that If the twenty-second amendment isn’t repealed that America may somewhere in the future pass up on an actual successful president that isn’t just in it for power. In the article, “Make way for Obama” by author Jeff Siegel, he defends his argument on why keeping the twenty-second amendment in congress is an absolute must in the American government. In this article, Jeff Siegel argues his position on why keeping the twenty-second amendment in office is best for the American people. Siegel’s main view on why not to repeal the twenty-second amendment is to simply avoid the chance of dictatorial rule. He states, “The 22nd amendment serves as a vital tool against the creation of dictatorial rule”. Furthermore, Sigel understands the concept of the slight advantage of repealing the amendment