Kurt Vonnegut Writing Style Analysis

Words: 1015
Pages: 5

Writing is an art, and like art people create it in different ways with different opinions on each piece made. These two authors, Neil Gaiman and Kurt Vonnegut, have two different views on the “rules of writing”. Although each authors set of eight rules could be said to have the same ideas, they are reaching two different kinds of audiences. Gaiman’s set of rules are about writing to please yourself as the writer, and to finish to find pride in it. On the other hand, Vonnegut’s set of rules are about writing for the reader, one person to be specific. For these reasons Gaimans set of eight rules are better suited for most writers because it allows the writer to focus on their writing not having to worry about the thoughts of readers but how …show more content…
Vonnegut attended Cornell University, but dropped out in January 1943 and enlisted in the United States Army. Was an American author. In a career spanning over 50 years, Vonnegut published fourteen novels, three short story collections, five plays, and five works of non-fiction. He is most famous for his darkly satirical, best-selling novel “Slaughterhouse-Five” (1969). Later in his career, Vonnegut published several autobiographical essay and short-story collections, including “Fates Worse Than Death” (1991), and “A Man Without a Country” …show more content…
Vonnegut does state some very good, useful tips in his rules that will make a writing a more completed piece. Vonnegut says: “Every sentence must do one of two things — reveal character or advance the action” (Vonnegut). This rule unlike his others are relatable to all writers, and all genres of writing. All writers must keep the characters up to something, or carrying the story on in order to write a piece that keeps everyone on their toes, and not bored with a slow moving story. Vonnegut other rules are very useful for other writers that getting their worked published. He mentions giving the readers what they want; let them know what’s going on, to not keep them in suspense. This is good for writers with an audience expecting certain things from their favorite writer. It keeps their group of readers coming back to their work, buying their books, because their giving the reader what they