Lao Tzu Analysis

Words: 894
Pages: 4

Hardly ever have the governmental views of two men unlike seeing that very much as they do among Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu. The Prince, written by Machiavelli, conveys Machiavelli's thoughts on what the government ought to do to do good from society. Benefiting civilization, according to Machiavelli, be surrounding all the authority and having full power over the populace. Lao-Tzu, on the other hand, holds an entirely dissimilar outlook on his Thoughts from the Tao-Te Ching. In this writing, he expresses his idea that populace just want to live in a theocracy or laissez-faire, the government ought to step back and let God lead the people into a suitable lifestyle. These two men have utterly different views regarding the way a government must …show more content…
“The worst is one who is despised.” (207) Machiavelli states that although to be equally cherished and feared would be most excellent, being the two at one time is not possible, thus “it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking.” (227) Machiavelli feels powerfully that a Prince must avoid being detested. “A prince must guard himself alongside being reviled and hated.” (226). Machiavelli couldn’t be additional as of the accuracy; his technique of ruling is brutal and makes the populace terror and look down on him. If I were to choose between the ideas I would most likely choose Lao-Tzu because I would rather live under his rules. I would rather live life on a greatest path rather than we having to fight against it living under hate not peace. Lao-Tzu wanted people to get away from being harmed from the world. I want to live somewhere where I can simply chase a peaceful and simple life style. Where all my wisdom and values I can still be my true inner