Lao Tzu And Machiavelli Analysis

Words: 1150
Pages: 5
Open Document
All through history, it can be contended that at the core of productive social order has stood a very powerful allotment of authority. In the readings, “The Tao Teh King” and “The Prince”, Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli have tried to achieve a total comprehension of this relationship. The subject of political leaders and their complex association with society undoubtedly shows itself inside both writings, but Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli approach this problem in different perspectives. Despite the fact that both readings express the approach to oversee a people, the “Tao Teh King" writes about sincerity, peace, and giving a shot for the universe to work its energy, meanwhile "The Prince" stresses the regular evil of men and urges for war. One writing is from the sixth century while the other is written in the sixteenth century so there is no specific rational motive where these two separate methods for thought ought to be in congruity. Both writings are comparable where they are profoundly loved however their political thinking’s are so different from one another that it can stress the limits between an overcoming country and a stale one. In the Tao, the overall messages is of desuetude or even possibly inaction until completely essential and, after it is all said and done making a move with no initial plan. The Tao trusts that the part of the Master is …show more content…
Machiavelli would have thought that Lao-Tzu to be a desiring individual while considering the general population and consider himself a pragmatist. Lao-Tzu believed, “…Taoism is to give people a sense of peace by accepting the underlying unity behind the confusing experiences of life” (Adu-Gyamfi 7) while Machiavelli explains what is more and reasons to acknowledge the genuine way of men is the best way to control properly, “There is such gap between how one lives and how one ought to live” (Jacobus
Show More

Related Documents: Lao Tzu And Machiavelli Analysis

Machiavelli And Lao Tzu Analysis

peaceful? Niccole Machiavelli and Lao Tzu two of the best philosophers were able to discuss this matter. Machiavelli dedicated “ The Prince” – a 16th century political treatise - to the new ruler of Florence trying to procure his support, but he was unsuccessful and forced to retire. “The Prince” shows the rulers how to accumulate and maintain power. He always stated that rulers must be cruel, dishonest, tough and manipulative in order to control the people. On the other hand, Lao Tzu in “Tao Te Ching”…

Words 452 - Pages 2

Lao Tzu Vs Machiavelli Analysis

The question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared is something that has been pondered for centuries. Lao-tzu proposed that it is better for a leader to be loved, whereas Machiavelli argued that it is better for a leader to be feared, as long as he is not hated. Throughout each of their writings, both have thoughts on war and military matters, human nature, and how they view a leader/think a leader should act, which are the bases of comparison between the two. Throughout their…

Words 1067 - Pages 5