Leibniz and the Problem of Evil Essay

Words: 3707
Pages: 15
Open Document
LEIBNIZ’S CONCEPTION OF THE PROBLEM OF EVIL BY OKOJIE E. PETER epo4escriva@yahoo.com MAY 2013 INTRODUCTION For many centuries, philosophers have been discussing evil, how it exists in the world, and how this relates to God. The discussion on evil and its relations to us is not an easy one though. It is commonly called the problem of evil. The problem of evil in contemporary philosophy is generally regarded as an argument for atheism. The atheist contends that God and evil are incompatible, and given that evil clearly exists, God cannot exist. The problem is generally used to disprove God’s existence by showing an inconsistency between an all-powerful, all-good, and all-knowing God; and the existence of evil. Philosophers over the centuries …show more content…
Amongst such ancient figures are: the Pythagoreans and Heraclitus. In the Pythagoreans’ view of the world as being governed by a continual conflict between order and disorder, good is placed on the side of order while evil on the side of disorder. While introducing the notion of the civil law as a reflection of the divine law which foreshadows the Stoics’ and medievals’ position, Heraclitus however balances off with another thought: “To God all things are fair and good and just, but men have supposed some unjust and some just.”7 By this Heraclitus seems to suggest there is no real distinction between good and evil, he means whatever is, is good. All these positions can be linked in the formulation of the problem of evil.
2

William F. Lawhead, The Voyage of Discovery: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy, 2nd ed., (Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2002) p.258 3 R. Douglas Geivett, Evil and the Evidence for God (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993) p.3 4 Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward Craig, (London and New York: Routledge) p.551 5 William F. Lawhead, Op. Cit., p.91 6 David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1947) p.243 7 William F. Lawhead, Op. Cit., p19

2|Page

The problem of evil in contemporary philosophy is regarded as an argument for atheism. The atheist contends that God and evil are incompatible, and given that evil clearly
Show More

Related Documents: Leibniz and the Problem of Evil Essay

Essay on Metaphysics and Leibniz

Gottfried Leibniz was born in 1646, the son of Friedrich Leibniz, a professor of moral philosophy at Leipzig. His father died when Leibniz was only six years old, and he was brought up by his mother (who was his father's third wife). His early years were informed by the moral and religious values of his mother that would play a significant role in his life and philosophy. He entered the Nicolai School in Leipzig at the age of seven, where he was taught Latin, though he advanced his own studies in…

Words 801 - Pages 4

All Possible Worlds Theodicy Analysis

The word evil, according to the Webster Dictionary, is defined as profound immorality, wickedness, and depravity. A lot of the time people use the word evil in a supernatural sense, exclusively talking about the devil, but actually the concept of evil is a lot more real than some invisible force that dwells beneath the earth’s crest. It is a lot more evidence of “real world evil” than any “other-worldly” evil in the universe. You see real-world evil every day when you turn on the television: terrorists…

Words 1470 - Pages 6

Module 4 Essay

fifth way was predicated on the observation that natural things act for an end or purpose. An intelligent being exists by which things are directed toward their end and this intelligent being is God. 12. Leibniz claims that this is the “best of all possible worlds”. - Leibniz was a continental rationalists of the 17th century. He believed that God, being all powerful, all knowing and all good, created the best of all worlds. With the principle of sufficient reason, stated there…

Words 1426 - Pages 6

Scientific Revolution Essay

deas that were first brought up in the Aristotle era which were eventually taught in Catholic teachings at the time. People with new ideas typically approached them with caution when telling them to the Pope. Nicolaus Copernicus had this very problem, as the founder of the heliocentric theory (which explained that the earth is not the center of the universe, but the sun was instead). However, because of the fear instilled because of the Pope, (1) Copernicus states in his 1543 book, On the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres …

Words 1106 - Pages 5

Philosophy 241 Lecture Note Essay

them with each other. 2. Normative ethics (the emphasis in this course): theories of the ethical distinctions between right and wrong, good and bad (desirable and undesirable, good and bad as applied to possible objects of desire), and good and evil (worthiness/unworthiness of esteem; good and bad as applied to the will itself, to character, virtues, vices). 3. Meta-ethics (the epistemology and metaphysics of ethics). Philosophy 541 when taught by Prof. Russ Shafer-Landau. The last unit of…

Words 7807 - Pages 32

John Locke Innate Ideas

Philosophy’ (1993), whilst making reference to other sources. I will evaluate both of the philosopher’s views to show that both theories have flaws. For example, Descartes’ requirement to believe in God and Locke’s heavy focus on empiricism, despite the problem of regularity. Due to this, I will conclude that whilst neither argument is fully convincing with their views on innate ideas, Descartes’ case is more convincing as the theory of having innate ideas is possible. Whilst Locke…

Words 2030 - Pages 9

Steinberger's Argument That The Maxims Of Breaking Promises

This reading, according to Steinberger, is unpersuasive in a couple of ways. Firstly, Steinberger realizes that the moral law is not guided by the mere logical consistence. Steinberger reviews Harrison’s argument that the maxim of breaking promises , if universalized, undermine the systematic harmony of purposes. Since such result is based on experience of breaking promises. Kemp argues that Kant indicates self-contradiction in the CI is essentially logical. Steinberger takes Harrison’s point is…

Words 7178 - Pages 29