Lifeboat Ethics Essay

Words: 985
Pages: 4

The topic of this essay which I will be discussing is whether the moral obligations of a citizen ought be extended only to national boundaries, and therefore, moral agents have a rational obligation only to people of their own country. My argument in support of this claim is that by donating aid to countries outside our own we are in fact, doing more harm than good in the long run one reason being that we are setting up a countries reliance on aid and the other being that we are potentially inviting a tragedy of commons as a result of overpopulation and environmental decline. The counter to my primary argument will be discussing Peter Singer and his ideas that if we have the means available to us then it is our duty to help those less fortunate than ourselves. My reply to this will be to discuss Hardin's lifeboat ethics scenario and if we are to help countries external …show more content…
At face value, the idea of helping those nations external to our own seems like something that a person of good moral character ought to feel obliged to do, after all one of the fundamental premises of consequentialism is that we should do the greatest good for the greatest number, therefore if we have additional resources then there should not be any reason to not be generous with our abundance and share it with those less fortunate than ourselves be it through financial aid, medical aid or food. However, if we investigate things just a little we discover that it is not quite that simple. As discussed in Lifeboat Ethics: The case against helping the poor (Hardin, 1974),There is a proposal that has been put forth of developing a world food bank which would allow for these poorer nations to draw from them in the event of crop failures and times of famine, however it is inferred that we may in fact be causing more harm than good by setting up a nations dependence on aid rather than teaching that nation how to support themselves in times of hardship. Another argument against providing aid