Like In Mean Girls Analysis

Words: 697
Pages: 3

had sex with two other boys in Lissa’s room, and used their blood to paint the wall with words, “if you stay beware.” Like in Mean Girls, this movie used the juxtapose images of “good” and “bad” women. In this context, Mia’s role is framed as the visible antagonist/bad girl in contrast with Lissa and Rose’s good girl persona. Even though, the best friends aren’t exactly a saint.
In their prom dance, Mia flashed her fangs to Rose. It was a tactic that meant to intimidate, and Rose punched her in response. Is that violence really necessary? Why is it that movies love to pit girls against each other as if both of them couldn’t co-exist in peace? Why is there always a catfight? This is the questions that we need to challenge. The blood whore allegations fueled Lissa to take revenge on Mia. She started using vampire compulsion to make everyone likes her. She stole Mia’s boyfriend and her friends. She started partying hard to reclaim her princess status. She was so consumed with her revenge, she started becoming a different person. There was a scene where Rose told Lissa that she doesn’t have to use compulsion to make everyone like her, because she’s equally charming and good in her own way. People would follow her in their own volition. Lastly, there’s Natalie Dashkov. She’s the third person in Lissa and Rose’s dual friendship. She’s
…show more content…
The story follows teenage girls, there’s common middle ground between all of them. There’s heighten focus on pitting girls against each other. There’s peer pressure, stifling beauty standards and other unrealistic expectations for teens. It’s either about hierarchy of social class, or boys. The movie wraps up with Rose, and Christian saving Lissa from her kidnappers. Lastly, there was an academy function where Lissa addressed the whole student body. She’s campaigning to end the feud among everyone. “The least you deserve is kindness, and dignity. And something