Macbeth Vs Macduff

Words: 488
Pages: 2

What might be the best approach to characterize a man? Is there an impeccable definition for a man? At the point when Macbeth tells his better half that they're not going to slaughter King Duncan, she blames him for being a weakling. Macbeth suggests that a genuine man wouldn't confer kill. His better half has the inverse view, and mockingly answers, "What beast was't, then, / That made you break this enterprise to me? / When you Durst do it, then you were a man". She wins the contention. Macduff is stating that he could "play" a lady's part and sob, while in the meantime gloating of the masculine reprisal he will go up against Macbeth. He implies that any feeling can be faked, yet that his feelings - both womanly and masculine - are earnest. Macbeth and Macduff have a considerable measure of things in like manner, additionally a ton not quite the same as their meaning of a man. …show more content…
They are both part of King Duncan's soldiers. They had families that they cared about and would do so much for them. They have also lost their loved ones.Macbeth was at once an individual that was doing his job, now he is the character that is taking over people’s lives and started to kill innocent people. Right before Macbeth started to begin to kill the harmless people and gain the power he was just as innocent as the citizens in his