Madness In Hamlet

Words: 441
Pages: 2

Revenge is a strong emotion. It is one that drives us to do the things that we as a people regret the most. But when revenge and madness are combined, a truly dangerous dangerous combination emerges. All of the sudden, no moral standards are upheld because madness removes the limitations of a common man. I believe that Hamlet was originally feigning madness to throw his “father’s” nose off of his tracks, but in his portrayal of a madman, Hamlet lost sight of reasonable revenge and became obsessed with it to the point of madness. The first sign of being obsessed with killing his father is his refusal to kill him at the alter. Any normal human being that in Hamlet’s position would have just stabbed Claudius and finished the job then and there. …show more content…
Hamlet goes so far as to walking back into the metaphorical lion’s den when he is offered to spar against Ophelia’s brother whom Hamlet has ought to have realized by this point has been brainwashed by Claudius. Not only that, but he is parading himself back into a kingdom in which the king has the ability to convince his disciples that Hamlet is the real bad guy. Regardless he waltzes straight into the king’s trap just because there is a slight possibility that he may or may not be able to kill the king. This is probably the biggest piece of evidence that Hamlet is revenge hungry and won’t take no for an answer. As the reader can see, Hamlet doesn’t have quite have all of his nuts and bolts in the right place, it is undeniable that he plays an insane gentleman well; perhaps a bit too well. In his obsession with killing the all while acting the part of an insane man, Hamlet may have contracted schizophrenic symptoms and blurred the lines of what was acting the madman for him and what was reality to him, hence leading to the conclusion that Hamlet was indeed a