Mahatma Gandhi's Civil Disobedience

Words: 556
Pages: 3

In a time of countries attempting to stake their place in the world even more than they already had, Gandhi fought for fairness and freedom from empire's dominance. Gandhi did so with a technique of non-violent, non-cooperation civil disobedience. From the realization in Africa that Indians did not have the same rights, Gandhi created a fearless demeanor of non-compliance with popular judgements and injustices(Briley). In 1915 when Gandhi went back to India, he also brought a strong fight that was adopted by an entire country(Briley). In the years that followed until his assassination, he was able to shake things up among self-proclaimed superiors of the British Empire. Gandhi became a very prominent figure in world politics and his ideals were emulated by brave …show more content…
Furthermore the non violent nature of their disobedience had the world's attention. Such a strong minded, skinny Indian man was able to show his people and an entire empire that what was right is freedom. Rather than provoke their anger with physical violence, Indian showed self control and a greater strength. “World War I strained Britain's resources.(Magstadt, 338)” Mahatma and the Indians took advantage of the depleted Great Britain. Gandhi through public forums was able to unite a nation for the one cause. The forward thinking of Gandhi helped fuel less violent protest for freedom all around the world. The most obvious and fitting comparison to Gandhi is Dr. Martin Luther King. King lead a nation of blacks to fight without their fists to gain the natural freedoms of a man. A comparison to Gandhi and Dr. King would be Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela is another great leader that followed in Gandhi’s footsteps. Ironically, Gandhi began his civil disobedient acts in the same country that Mandela was born and raised in, South Africa. Leaders found progress and freedom through a new realm of fighting, non-violent