Malcolm X Assassination Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 1611
Pages: 7

I apologize I didn't realize you had answered my questions until you told me you had and I went back and read your email again and formatted your statements that responded to my statements/questions, which are as follows.

My statement: “It's all smoke and mirrors a big con game played on Blacks. Name me one political policy that benefited Blacks that Farrakhan has put his life on the line to get passed into law like Dr. King did”

Your answer: “UNTIL NOT LONG AGO...THE NATION OF ISLAM'S MEMBERS DID NOT VOTE, SO ITS NOT STRANGE THAT FARRAKHAN HAS NOT BEEN MOTIVATED UNTIL RECENTLY TO TALK ABOUT CHANGING LAWS, HE IS NOW ASKING ALL HIS MEMBERS TO CAST THEIR VOTE AND INSTRUCTING THEM ON HOW MUCH FAIRNESS CAN HELP THE COUNTRY.“ (during that period
…show more content…
I know nothing I tell you carry any weight I can't compete with your boogeyman,CHOLLY (WHT MAN).

You are so convinced that the government had Malcolm killed. I've told you plain and clear why NOI had him killed. “SO”, now I want you to please tell me what do you know that Malcolm did that was such a big threat to the government that the government had him killed?

You are so jaded by your prejudices toward the white man that white men is your number one nemesis that you are blinded by the wrong doing of anyone else and blame their wrong actions on white man also. There is not one atrocity committed by whites that you know about that I DON'T know about also but I'm also just aware of the crimes committed by Blacks and I hold them accountable also with making excuses for their bad and poor behavior.

Here is some superfluous information for you, Anwar Sadat was 31 when he married his wife that was 15 years old at the time and they had 4 children of which a son named GAMAL. How is that for superfluous information? I try to stay away from this type info because it serves no useful purpose it's more along the lines of