Man In The Water Analysis

Words: 769
Pages: 4

In the article, "Man in the Water", by Roger Rosenblatt, it describes the courageous acts of a human being, to many others. This article contains irony, this young man saved others, just like other people did, but he died, and the others did not. How does nature choose who lives and dies? They say that humans can't and never will control nature, but does nature have compassion for this kind of people that do acts like these? I believe that there is one theme, that stands out above all theses acts combined, and I think that this is selflessness. There are there examples from this in this article, commitment, powerless, and selfless.
To begin, in the article "Man in the Water", the first main point has to do with how committed he was. There are times that he knew that he was going to die, but that he still stuck with what he started, and continued to save others instead of saving himself. When he got onto the plane, he was like every other person on that flight, they were not expecting to die or have a life changing event that day. He was described as alert and in control by two other helpers from the crash. Every time a life-line and floating ring was lowered, he passed it off
…show more content…
Man will never be able to conquer nature, but sometimes we think that we can because nature gives us a break. He reluctantly lost the fight, because nature got him, and he was killed. "Everything in nature contains all the powers of nature," this was a quote in the article, that describes the man in the water as having his own powers. He had the power of will and the power of courage. He was not given the power to survive after he helped many others survive themselves. He was giving life to a stranger, and that was giving power of nature because it had to do with life. The man in the water fought against a common enemy, death, but nature did not help him in this