Marijuana Legalization In Colorado Summary

Words: 928
Pages: 4

The authors of the article had the primary objective of establishing the impact that legislation of marijuana would have on the adolescents in the country. They had a comparison between the likely effect of legalization of the drug and the effect of the same while it is illegal. The researchers used data from the “Youth Behavioral Surveillance Survey from the year 1991 to 2011. The article discusses extensively the likely impact of legalization of marijuana on the lives of adolescents. The conclusion that the authors make is that the legalization of the drug would increase the use of marijuana among the youth. Therefore, they are against the legalization. There is some confusion that the authors bring up because while they say that they are …show more content…
Their focus is on the implications in Colorado. According to the authors, legalization of marijuana in Colorado would cause complex health effects to its citizens. It is the responsibility of the medical fraternity to give a perspective that has balance regarding the discussion of both the benefits and the risks. The article goes ahead to state that in the case of legalization of the drug in Colorado, there is likely to be an increase in intoxication that results from the legal use of marijuana. The detrimental effects of such are broken homes, accidents, and crime. Therefore, the authors note that there are likely to be more vices in case the drug becomes legal in Colorado. They agree that the drug has medicinal advantages, but they demur that the medical use warrants the legalization thereof. One strength of the article is the viewpoint of medical practitioners. Cho, Benz, Zaller, Warren, Risng, and McConnell (2014); and Merino (2011) lack the medical perspectives in their discussions. However, Monte, Zane, and Heard (2015) contains purely medical viewpoint. Therefore, while the other authors unintentionally indicated that the medical fraternity was for the support of the legalization, the article shows that it is untrue. In spite of this, the article has a weakness in the limitation of the research because they conduct it in Colorado