Marriage and Supreme Court Essays

Submitted By YallahYolo1
Words: 811
Pages: 4
Open Document
Rami Debbas
Gerald Roiteg
Business Law
2 march 2013

Eric vs. Lola case
The supreme court of Canada decision of Eric and Lola case has not been released yet. Eric and Lola are unmarried Quebec couples that lived together and then split up, however they don’t have the rights as legally married couples. The parties had their real names changed to Eric and Lola under the protected family law for their 3 children privacy. Eric the billionaire businessman met his ex-girlfriend (Lola) in Brazil when she was 17 years old and he was 32 years old entrepreneur. The case of the parties had been making its way through the court system for years. It’s about a Quebec couples where never married and stayed together for 7 years with sharing a 3 children. When Lola and Eric separated, she sought spousal support but the Quebec civil code do not provide such provision for parties who are not legally married. Lola had been seeking 50 million dollar lump sum payments and also 56000 dollar a month from her formal spouse. Moreover Eric agreed to give generous child support money and rejected the alimony claim and the lump sum that she asked for.

The Quebec law of the common-law spouses is if an unmarried Quebec couple that lives together and then split up has not the same rights as a married couple but there is some provinces in Canada have the civil code marriage rights. Here in Quebec called it “De facto spouses” law; they give people freedom of choice of living together without having the responsibilities and rights that civil code of Quebec gives it to married partners regardless of the years that they stay together. However de facto spouses can have a contract of cohabitation that can give the rights of what the couples want and can cover daily life aspect, children and the family arrangements and also including provisions if breakup or death happen. As for the child support law, parents who where married, in civil union or in a de facto has same obligations and rights to their children.

The decision of the Supreme Court that the civil code of Quebec has handle the financial statement of couples who are not legally married. Province of Quebec has more than 31.5% of partners being in de facto relationship and the rest of Canada has average of 12.1%. Quebec stays the only province that doesn’t have de facto marriages. The dissection that Supreme Court does not have to give the common law partners the same right as the married spouses. However, there are some laws that treat them as a couple such as income tax, governing social assistance, and Quebec’s pension plan. The case has going through for many years in the court; they started Lola’s case to the Quebec superior court in 2009, a year after the Quebec court decided that the law discriminates against unmarried spouses and gave them a year to change it. After all the Quebec government said that they did a mistake and asked to take it to the
Show More

Related Documents: Marriage and Supreme Court Essays

Essay United States and Supreme Court

2012, “No Supreme Court decision on gay marriage: 'Just more waiting'” This article is about the third rail issue of gay marriage and the Supreme Court’s recent action, or lack thereof, concerning this issue. People all over American have been patiently waiting for the Supreme Court to make a national decision on gay marriage. Many waited in anxiety to hear the fate of gay marriage in the Supreme Court last Monday, December 3. On the morning before the decision whether the court would hear…

Words 660 - Pages 3

Thea Spyer V. Edith Windsor: Case Study

Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were a legally married couple in Toronto, Canada. Their marriage was recognized in 2008 under state New York law. Thea Spyer passed away from old age in 2009. Edith Windsor applied for a federal tax exemption concerning the property she inherited from Spyer. The IRS claimed that under federal law, specifically section 3 of the DOMA(Defense of Marriage Act) that their marriage was not recognized by federal law and that the federal tax exemption would not apply to her.…

Words 892 - Pages 4

Judicial Restraint

Judicial Activism v. Judicial Restraint The Supreme Court often oversteps its bounds as protectors of individual rights: while its use of judicial activism can at times secure citizens’ civil liberties and rights and can also check the power of the other branches of government, the employment of personal or political motives in these decisions often lose the integrity of judicial review. In these cases, the Supreme Court justices are endowed with tremendous power and may use this power to further…

Words 1735 - Pages 7

Essay on Ruling Against Texas Article Used Eric Schlotzhauer

Ruling against Texas' gay marriage ban may set up Supreme Court fight A federal judge rejects Texas' ban on gay marriage. The latest ruling in a conservative state may move the issue closer to the Supreme Court. By Molly Hennessy-Fiske February 26, 2014, 6:41 p.m. HOUSTON — A federal judge in deeply conservative Texas overturned the state's ban on same-sex marriage Wednesday, saying the prohibition is unconstitutional and stigmatizes gay couples, a ruling that gay rights advocates say adds significant…

Words 900 - Pages 4

CITIZEN INFLUENCE IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Essay

CITIZEN INFLUENCE IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 18 SEPTEMBER 2013 Same-sex marriage is an issue that has slowly gained the national spotlight since Jack Baker and Jim McConnell applied for a marriage license in 1970. Although they were denied this opportunity, their actions jumpstarted the effort to legalize same-sex marriage. Gay marriage has been a controversial and widely debated topic polarizing Americans in the recent years. Much of the debate has centered on controversy over California’s Proposition…

Words 2180 - Pages 9

Essay about Same-Sex Marriage

Defining Marriage Same-sex marriage is a hotly debated topic right now. Part of the debate is on how marriage is defined and who ultimately gets to define marriage. Opponents of same-sex marriage define marriage as a religious institution that is recognized by the state. Proponents of same-sex marriage define marriage as a legal agreement only. Laws governing the definition of marriage are currently decided by individual state legislatures. The federal government weighed in on the subject when…

Words 580 - Pages 3

Ms. Kim Davis Case Study

decline to issue gay marriage licenses and pay extreme results by the court or take after the requests from the Supreme Court. The specialist here suggests it is Ms. Kim Davis to settle on that choice. Likewise, the capacity to tell the "right" from "wrong" shows that she ought to take after the requests gave by the Supreme Court as opposed to denying it and perhaps going to a district imprison. The suggestion here is that her duty is to take after requests from the Supreme Court and has no privilege…

Words 886 - Pages 4

Plessy V Ferguson Analysis

have, or have some entrenched belief of superiority that causes them to see an uneven situation as fair. The Supreme Court has had a powerful hand in many of these issues, such as segregation, racism, and homophobia. Decisions handed down by the Supreme Court had and continue to have the ability to shape the very fabric of the nation, in favor either of balance or injustice. The Supreme Court is tasked with upholding the constitution, which ultimately stands to protect citizens of the United States…

Words 1281 - Pages 6

Same-Sex Marriages Essay

Gay marriage is a topic that has sparked a lot of interest in our nation and its media lately. The most recent article that I have read was about Utah, and how the Supreme Court on all same-sex marriages in the state. The Supreme Court blocked the same sex marriages; this was a unanimous order which was made in favor of the state. After the allowance of same-sex marriages was originally passed in 2004, hundreds of people attempted to receive one, and it is unknown how many of these couples were married…

Words 497 - Pages 2

Pennlive's Rhetorical Analysis: The Legalization Of Gay Marriage

got it right - It’s no longer ‘gay marriage.’ It’s ‘marriage.’ and we’re better for it: editorial, implies that the Supreme Court made the right decision when gay marriage was legalized. Pennlive’s purpose is to further analyze why the decisions for gay marriage was the correct one. They adopt a dynamic tone in order to persuade in their adult readers. Pennlive opens their editorial by stating that day when the Supreme Court's decision was made for gay marriage in all 50 states. They appeal to the…

Words 455 - Pages 2