Mcculloch V. Ireland Case Summary

Words: 1423
Pages: 6

There were two major questions that were in the landmark case that was McCulloch v. Maryland in the year 1819. The first question that was discussed in this case was if the Congress had a right or not to set up a bank or any other kind of a corporation or business. The thing was that this was not something that was shown anywhere in the Constitution, that is why they need they need to make a decision themselves. They said even that the federal government only had the power that was listed in the Constitution that this powers could have an extension that said something different. Even that the word bank is not something that is said, it said that they have the right to manage money, which is something that can be shown as if it was a bank. The …show more content…
The interest groups also use something that is donating money through PACs since they can not donate money directly from them they use this form to collect money and donate the money to the candidates they want to support. One of the last things that they use is grassroots lobbying they use this when they want to contact members of government officials or legislator about important issues that are going on in the world. When the interest groups what's to make or convince someone from a lawsuit they use litigation to convince the members, for example, if there was to be a lawsuit against someone because of a crime then the interest group will use litigation to convince them they're guilty or innocent depending on the situation. When interest groups wanted to donate money to their candidate they use PACs, for example, if they wanted to give money to the next election to one of their candidates they will use PACs to collect money and support their candidate. If the interest groups were to have a problem or a concert on an issue for example if someone passes a new law that interest groups did not agree on then they will use grassroots lobbying to convey their