Mcdonald's Argumentative Analysis

Words: 503
Pages: 3

Besides the low quality of meat, the Ammonium hydroxide is harmful to health. Oliver famously coined this the “pink slime” process.” In 2014, over 36,258 McDonald's restaurants 2operate worldwide,1 serving over 69 million people every day. This means that 69 million people are at risk with the hamburger meat they are eating. McDonald's is detrimental because they put “pink slime” in some of there food for it to become fatter like there hamburger.Another is kids are being hooked to McDonalds at age 3 which can keep them hooked for a long time.Hamburger Chef Jamie Oliver proves McDonald's burgers “Unfit for human consumption” McDonald's is more detrimental than beneficial.
Mcdonald's is detrimental because they put “pink slime” in some of there
…show more content…
“Kids under the age of 7 or 8 they do not have the ability to understand the persuasive intent of advertising and marketing.” Hamburger Chef Jamie Oliver proves McDonald's burgers “Unfit for human consumption” In the article, “Hamburger Chef Jamie Oliver proves McDonald's burgers “Unfit for human consumption,” it states that after Oliver showed how McDonald’s hamburgers are made, the franchise finally announced that it will change the recipe. This proves that the hamburgers are supposed to be more “healthy.”After Jamie Oliver showed how McDonald’s hamburgers are made, the franchise finally announced that it will change its recipe.This shows that Jamie Oliver made McDonald's change their recipe to something at least a little healthier.
In conclusion, McDonald's is more detrimental then benifical.Mcdonalds is detrimental because they put “pink slime” in some of there food for it to become fatter