Melissa Coleman Back To The Land Analysis

Words: 830
Pages: 4

The need to uncover the truth of a childhood tragedy and connecting it to the beauty and vitality of the back-to-the-land movement was characterized by the idea that everyday life is methodically based on a set of moral values and choices. Melissa Coleman felt that living in an era where she suffered because of how she was destitute, it was very unbearable for her and her family having to see others have everything while they had very little to enjoy even if they lived life very happy, like if they had everything. “They’re rich in love, and support from their family and friends but not in money” (Michaels, ND). What’s being stated is that her family and friends give her sufficient love and support, therefore all her and her family needed was the money. Moving to carve a farm from the woods on the coast of Maine, made Eliot and Sue begin to forge a new existence, growing and building a home with their own hands. Being poor means you worry a lot more about common, everyday things than everyone else, whether they're middle class, super rich, or somewhere in-between. They never had time to plan further in the future, they barely had time to plan for the present. With all things being considered what matters most when people are struggling financially is the …show more content…
Melissa stated, “ To this day I have a fear of incorrectly setting the table” (Coleman, 139). New things are always considered a challenge because people never know how the situation might be to overcome it. Melissa approaches how hard it was for her to overcome the situation by stating “Every time I was with my friend, I would continue to make the same mistake on the correct order of linen napkins, China plates, and crystal glasses” (Coleman, 139). It was something that she never experienced doing in her house, and now that she’d do it at somebody's else's house it was an embarrassment because she would always do it