Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

Words: 498
Pages: 2
Open Document
The case Miranda v. Arizona (1966) indicated that police officers must read suspects their Miranda rights before taking them into custody or for questioning. This process means that officers must advise suspects that anything they say can be used against them in a law court. Some people argue that Miranda warnings have damage how law enforcement operate as in preventing officers from gathering more information before they take a suspect into custody. On the other hand, the Miranda rights have not done any detectable damage to law enforcement. However, it has helped them to do a better job by ensuring that the pieces of evidence in which they gather will hold up in court, and also they can properly convict guilty criminals and fulfill their responsibility of protecting the citizens. Many suspects do confess to officers of their guilt because mostly they hope for a lesser punishment. The court imposes these guidelines so that officers will follow proper guidelines before taking an accused to custody. The Miranda rights also protect the accused by making them aware of their rights before they are taken into police custody. It also prevents defendants from self-incriminating. Defendants have the right to their …show more content…
Arizona is Salinas v. Texas (2013). In this case, in 1992, Houston police officers were investigating a double homicide in Houston Texas. The police question a man called Salinas regarding his role in the murder. He did answer all the questions, by this point he had not been read his Miranda right. However, the police did ask Salina's whether the shotgun shells that has been found at the crime scene of the murder match the shotgun that has been found in his house, he kept quiet and remained silence in response to the question. Later, the police investigation led the police to conclude that salina was involved in the double homicide. Salina's was charged with the double murder. Eventually, he was nowhere to be
Show More

Related Documents: Miranda V. Arizona Case Study

Criminal Policy Research Paper

of the courts and the police. The abuse of power that had taken place within these agencies, in England would come to an abrupt stop with the advent of the Bill of Rights and the fourth, fifth and sixth amendments, in particular (U.S. Constitution Study Guide, 2013). The fourth amendment dealt primarily with the protection of the people to be secure with their persons, papers, houses and personal effects. This protection would include guidelines that the courts and policing officers would have to…

Words 2225 - Pages 9

Government: First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Navigation Privileges Precedent Essay

Alexys Allen August 1, 2014 Part Three: Court Cases 1. Marbury v. Madison(1803): Designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia the last minute appointment were never fully finalized Precedent: when the constitution conflicts with an act of the legislature that act is invalidated established the supreme courts power of judicial law 2. McCulloch v. Maryland(1819): The state of Maryland passed legislation to impose lanes on the bank, McCulloch the cashier, of Baltimore…

Words 3075 - Pages 13

All About Me Essay

times. History of the United States: Continued The Civil Rights Movement Begins In the 1940s and 1950s the NAACP attacked race discrimination in the courts. It chipped away at Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), a Supreme Court decision upholding segregationist laws. The NAACP lawyers' greatest success was the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision in 1954, in which the Supreme Court ordered desegregation of schools. The decision struck a Chicago newspaper as a "second emancipation proclamation…

Words 5058 - Pages 21

Research Paper On Cold Society

information about the atomic bomb to Russia  Not overwhelming evidence, but they are convicted and sentenced to execution o After the execution, their son tries to prove his families innocence  We know now they were completely guilty - These cases leave everyone to worry about spies - Senator Joseph McCarthy o Uses hysteria to his advantage o Says the federal government is full of spies o Constantly accuses people of being spies  Ruins careers  Anyone expected of being a communist of…

Words 2896 - Pages 12