Essay on morals of agreement

Submitted By haseebansari
Words: 997
Pages: 4
Open Document
February 12, 2010
Morals By Argreement?

APOLOGIA
By Hendrik van der Breggen
(The Carillon, February 11, 2010)

Morals by agreement?

A contemporary view of ethics (popular in theory and practice if not in name) is contractarianism, a.k.a. morals by agreement. Let’s get clear on this theory of ethics, and then let’s assess it from the point of view of critical/ careful thinking.

Contractarianism can be traced back to the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that there is no God, that there is no natural/intrinsic Right or Wrong, and that people are self-interested. Famously, Hobbes summed up the human predicament as follows: In a state of nature (i.e., in a situation with no God, no objective moral values, but with lots of self-interested people), humankind faces a “war of all against all” and life is “nasty, brutish, and short.”

Nevertheless, according to Hobbes, there is hope. Because people are in fact self-interested, they desire peace to escape fear and conflict and to protect the fruit of their personal industry. Moreover, because people are also intelligent, they give power to a Sovereign (i.e., a government) in exchange for peace and the arbitration of disputes. Morality, then, emerges from enlightened self-interest.

Ethics essentially consist of some agreed-to prohibitions against force and fraud, i.e., some agreed-to constraints on unbridled self-interest, which are backed up with government force (e.g., police, soldiers) and reinforced by culture (e.g., school, church).

Contemporary philosopher Antony Flew: “A general explanation of morality and [self-]interest might be stated thus: all our benefits come from the existence of a stable society; the observance of certain moral rules is a necessary condition of such a society; hence we have an interest in maintaining moral order.”

Therefore, according to contractarianism, ethics are ultimately and merely a social contract (implicitly or explicitly held) that is prudent for everyone to accept.

What should we think about Contractarian ethics? Is it reasonable to hold? It seems to me that there are pros and cons, but the cons outweigh the pros.

Here are some pros:

Pro 1. Contractarianism appeals to our sense that people should be free to decide which moral views they think is best. Personal autonomy, after all, is important.

Pro 2. Contractarianism appeals to our sense that we should have a minimal morality to allow us to live together via agreement in the midst of (apparently) diverse moral views. Prudence and an element of practicality in morality are important, surely.

Pro 3. Contractarianism seems to harness and direct people’s self-centeredness in a positive other-oriented direction. This is especially appealing in a democratic free-enterprise economic system that relies on agreements between employees and employers, buyers and sellers, governed and government. The idea is that I’ll do what you want, if you do what I want. Win-win!

So far, so good. But there are cons, too, which shouldn’t be ignored:

Con 1. Yes, contractarianism is attractive; however, its attraction seems to arise from confusing a political view for an ethical view. Keeping agreements is important for a society to function, to be sure, but on contractarianism the agreements become mistaken for morality, the latter of which is more basic than the former. In turns out that on contractariansim the social contract between government and governed, or between self-interested individuals or groups, is substituted for the deep understandings of right and wrong by which we can and should judge the social contract in the first place.

Think of it this way: We are willing to agree to prohibit act X because we think X is wrong (so far so good); but then, on contractarian moral philosophy, act X ends up being wrong merely because we agree that X is wrong. But this is to engage in philosophical sleight
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on morals of agreement

Essay on Stocks For The Long Run

Westermarck (1862-1939), “The Sources of Moral Ideas: Society, Custom, and Sympathy” Question: Are there any objective moral judgments? Are moral judgments about some reality, and so true/false insofar as they correspond with that reality? Are moral judgments one’s that all persons with intellect/reason concur in making? I. Definition of objectivity Objectivity in judgment requires that: (a) The judgment can be seen to be true by everyone who has all the information relevant to the truth…

Words 1116 - Pages 5

Ethic Theories

actions for their selves Will the company benefit from new teachers Utilitarianism Conti. 4 Pro’s    Consequences are in place no matter Provides guidance to those who need it Provides moral decision or choices Con’s    Suffer from making something moral that is not Utilizing your own moral values Looking for good out of the situation Kant Theory 5 Defined as principles behind actions rather than the action’s result.  Kant, believed that certain types of actions (including murder…

Words 469 - Pages 2

Carol Gilligan Research Paper

Carol Gilligan is an American feminist and psychologist born in 1936. Carol Gilligan worked with Lawrence Kohlberg, who was also an American psychologist in order to create their new theory on moral decisions. Carol Gilligan believed that whether or not a decision should be considered moral or unmoral should be based on the person’s relationship with the other person. Carol Gilligan ran a test where she asked a young girl and boy whether or not they believed it would be O.K to steal and expensive…

Words 313 - Pages 2

Business Evnironment Responsbility Jou Essay examples

Environmental Responsibility in Taiwan — Moral, Legal or Negotiated ABSTRACT. This study explores both the negotiating styles and moral reasoning processes of husiness people and governmental officials in Taiwan, so as to provide a footing for "outsiders" when negotiating with Taiwanese over environmental concerns. Findings imply that Taiwanese husiness people and governmental officials can and will reason hoth at the conventional level and at the postconventional level of moral judgment. But, results of this…

Words 5552 - Pages 23

Negotiation, Bargaining, and Conflict Management Essay

Instructor: AJene Maxwell November 11, 2013 Abstract Parties involved in negotiation tend to use various tactics to derail direction of negotiation process. Negotiation involves two parties that are seeking to reach an agreement. In most either party tend to use tactics for their own interest. One of these tactics is withholding information. In withholding information they tend to believe they have the upper hand. It is a silent attempt to move the negotiation to their…

Words 1785 - Pages 8

Court Case: Heard V. Washington States

1. Whether negotiating and advising a client to accept a settlement agreement that includes worthless interests, then keeping all the cash from the settlement absent both the clients consent and a bill of accounting violates the Washington State rules for professional conduct. 2. Whether an attorney initiating a sexual relationship with a vulnerable client and providing alcohol to them is an act of moral turpitude under the Rules of Lawyer Discipline. Facts: Attorney James Heard represented a…

Words 780 - Pages 4

Essay about Graphic Designers

I N F O R M A T I O N SH E E T G 0 7 5 v 0 5 January 2012 Graphic Designers & Copyright In this information sheet, we give a brief overview of copyright issues affecting graphic designers. People who use graphic design or engage graphic designers may also find it helpful. More detailed information is provided in our book Graphic Designers & Copyright. Other information sheets that may be relevant are Artworks, Logos, Websites, and Assigning & Licensing Rights. For information about these and…

Words 4452 - Pages 18

Morality and Social Contract Essay

Illustrate the idea that morality is a conventional agreement for our own advantage and one problem with this. Do you often ask yourself, ‘why am I behaving in this civil way, when I could be gaining a lot more by behaving in a different way?’ Some claim that we are born with morals, and that it is a priori knowledge, however other philosophers argue that morality is in fact an agreement between humans. The idea that morality is a convential agreement for our own advantage is a very interesting…

Words 720 - Pages 3

Essay on Social Contract and Harmonious Social Living

Smith and reach an agreement about what to do (and if we assume that the agreement would be enforced somehow, so you can be confident that it will be kept), then it would be rational to agree that neither of you will confess. In that case, you would each be released after only one year. Obviously this is a better result than if you both confessed. The conclusion social contractarians draw from the dilemma is that we are better off if we cooperate, adopting an (enforced) agreement or social contract…

Words 837 - Pages 4

Pros And Cons Of Nafta

American Free Trade Agreement which consists of America, Canada and Mexico. The agreement was created in order to build economic growth for the three countries also eliminating barriers and trades between the countries. The agreement was to build the largest trade zone between the three and give American's 200,000 jobs by 1995. It received a lot of controversy due to the agreement involving two developed countries and one currently developing country. The North American Free Trade Agreement was put into…

Words 612 - Pages 3