Mount Everest Case Summary

Words: 1512
Pages: 7

Problem Statement: Since Rob Hall and Scott Fischer did not adequately formulate their expedition teams, did not sufficiently prepare their clients to make proper and safe judgements or decisions in situations that could put the crew’s lives at risk, and not suitably assuming the roles that they were playing as guides, consequently, the Mount Everest expeditions conducted by Mountain Madness and Adventure Consultants resulted in five climbers losing their lives on May 10, 1996, including the founders of these companies.
Analysis:
Climbing Mount Everest is no easy feat, and any experienced climber knows that for a successful climb, ascending and descending, that everything, such as the weather, plans, logistics, and training must be perfect.
…show more content…
You would want someone with experience, someone who is willing to get the job done no matter what the cost, and someone who the manager or expeditioner can see themselves mending with and being able to work well with. Unfortunately, because of the narcissistic traits of Hall and Fischer, they started off the expedition with making some bad decisions for the group right away. Hall, brought in Jon Krakauer, who is a journalist from Outside magazine. The reason Hall had made this decision is because he felt that is was the best decision from a business standpoint, exchanging the fees of the expedition for magazine advertising space. Krakauer was very inexperienced with climbing at high altitudes, as he had only been known for avidly rock climbing. Fischer made the decision to bring along high-profile New York socialite who wrote for Allure and Conde Nast Traveler magazine, Sandy Pittman. She was not well-liked by many known expeditioners, mainly because of her process of getting herself into the climbing scene. Fischer viewed having her along as an opportunity to also promote his company because if he could get her to the summit, then she would write great things about him. Fischer also selected Dale Kruse, who provided money for the expedition, but he had a history of getting sick at high altitudes However, issues had happened much deeper into the …show more content…
The answer to this call is regulation and policy on these companies’ safety standards. This regulation needs to ensure that qualified individuals will be selected on expeditions such as these, safety procedures will be laid out in full, and that nobody, no matter how committed, if under any distress, shall turnaround and return home before tragedy and death strikes again.