Mr Spicer Case Summary

Words: 1552
Pages: 7

Legal representative for Mr. Spicer stated that they wanted to begin with an opening statement stating that the non-custodial parent (NCP), Mr. Spicer, admits that between 1997 and 2003, he was obligated to pay child support, but he denies that he ever failed to pay child support that would result in a deficiency of $46,000.00 plus dollars. First, Mr. Spicer has denied ever receiving proper notice of a judgment being entered against him for failure to pay child support. He contends this was a due process violation that should be considered in these proceedings. Second, Mr. Spicer points out that all the monies taken for child support were by court order through his employers. That if any funds were ordered and were not taken, those employers should be made parties and be liable to pay. Mr. Spicer was never ordered, held in contempt, or ordered in any proceedings for failing to pay child support, and that he has submitted detailed documents to the effect that shows that he did pay by payroll deduction through his employers when he was working. Therefore, Mr. Spicer question or denies that he owes the amount of money that he is being asked for contingency. He also denies that his bank account should be …show more content…
Spicer and Attorney Crenshaw alleges that Mr. Spicer does not owe support and the past due support is incorrect. DHR’s response is as follows: On the Alexander case, DHR is enforcing an Order signed October 27, 1997 ordering the sum of $67.50 per month towards the arrears and the interest. On the Wilson case, DHR is enforcing an Order signed by Judge Jack W. Meigs on October 16, 2002 ordering the sum of $347.00 per month commencing on November 1, 2002. The NCP did not initially provide any documentation to support his allegations of not owing support and the past due support being incorrect on either case after supporting documentation was requested from Attorney