Murder On A Sunday Morning Analysis

Words: 1025
Pages: 5

The United States of America has a problem with crimes. Weather it is murder to jaywalking in the street, there are problems. But the more serious ones however hurt the worst. While stuff like jaywalking just gets you a ticket, it might hurt your feelings but not much else. But murder not only hurts the family of the victim, it hurts the family of the accused. Now, because of your actions your family has to be asked questions by police, lawyers, and just anyone who heard about the crime. But if you get weather you get accused is up to the jury. If you get accused it makes the situation wore for your family and your friends. But better for the family of the victim, because they finally they will have relieve that the person who killed their family is put away for it. In the novel, Monster, and the documentary, “Murder on a Sunday Morning” are more alike because they had to go threw getting accused, pushing threw racism and prejudice, and the outcomes of their problems.

The novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers is about a 15 year old boy being charged for felony murder. The fifteen year
…show more content…
They also had to go threw all the racism they took from the police and the prejudice they took from the jury and lawyers. Both Steve and Brendon had to go threw the pain of thinking they were going to be guilty, but at the end finding out they weren’t. Steve was accused of felony murder and robbery. Him and his “friends” tried to rob a drugstore and it went bad. Brendon Buttler got accused of the same thing, murder and robbery. Brendon was accused by Mr. Stephens, the victims husband. But he later realized that he wasn't the same guy that came and shot his wife. The main character in the novel and documentary both had to go threw a rough time just to be not