Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter

Words: 580
Pages: 3

Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote the novel The Scarlet Letter with a certain confidence in letting the story create its own ending and not predetermining the outcome. Four critics from the anthology Harvard Classics Shelfs of Fiction view Hawthorne’s style of writing as a work of art that is created by not controlling the ending of it, but letting it take its own course. The well written novel not only demonstrates how elaborate Hawthorne is in creating a plot line, but how well written and powerful the context of the novel is (Criticisms and Interpretations II-IV). George E. Woodberry, one of the critics, sees Hawthorne’s novel as “a great and unique romance, standing apart by itself in fiction.” Woodberry regards his originality in the style of writing as “complete artistic expression” with a “decorative quality.” Because of Hawthorne’s writing technique, the words he uses seem to build onto each other, creating a fascinating tale without having a prearranged ending. In a sense, Woodberry recognizes the brilliance of the format of the novel as being not only a spectacle of the real world, but one that is “of eternal life” (Woodberry). …show more content…
To Symons, Hawthorne “had the Puritan sense of it in the blood, and the power to use it artistically in the brain” in a way that is rarely attempted or achieved. He explains how Hawthorne carefully showed the thin boundary between good and evil. Symons describes in detail how the importance of “mortal law” can only be explained in the novel by breaking it. He frequently uses the term “sin” as a way of explaining reality, drawing the boundary between what he considers to be “a great reality” and “a dream”