Native American Mascots Analysis

Words: 508
Pages: 3

Doing the correct action no matter what is ethical. The cartoon “Mascots” does the correct action by keeping Native American Mascots, the article “Savior Sibling” does the correct action by not allowing kids to be born for organs, and the novella excerpt “Lather and Nothing Else” displays the act of saving a life. initially, doing the correct action no matter what is ethical, as demonstrated by keeping Native American Mascots, forgetting them would be hard, through the consequentialist normative ethic. Phil Hands in his cartoon, informs caucasians on how it can be offensive to have native american mascots. In the cartoon he explains why mascots might seem offensive but are not meant to be. In the cartoon Hands describes “it's not meant to be offensive”. He's trying to say it's the correct action because without mascots, Native Americans might not be honored as they should. Hands also hints in his cartoon that the Native Americans might be forgotten if the mascots are taken away.
Furthermore, doing the correct action no matter what, as demonstrated by not having a clone made for spare parts, is
…show more content…
Hernando Tellez persuades Columbians not to kill unarmed soldiers, because even in war people need to keep integrity. The text is about a barber who decides not to kill. The barber shows it's the correct action to do when he says “ and i do my work honorably I don't want to stain my hands with blood”(15). It is important to keep integrity in times of war, because killing an unarmed man is murder. At the end of the day people still have to live with themselves, and the actions they have done. In the cartoon “Mascots”, the article “Savior Sibling”, and the novella “ Lather and Nothing Else”, all do the correct action no matter what. Therefore in the end all bad situations in a way will be