Nature Of Death According To David Hum Analysis

Words: 682
Pages: 3

Peter Berger identifies death as the ultimate threat to humans, as it signifies the end of their existence. In reality, out of all the most difficult aspects of life, the end of life is the most problematic. Death is thus an important aspect of the problem of evil that is addressed by Muslim theologist. Said Nursî uses death as the ultimate example to prove that all evil is relative. Said Nursî defends death as an emancipation from worldly afflictions as well as a prelude to an eternal life where justice is served. Nursî first makes a distinction between the appearance and reality of death. On the surface, death appears to be a bitter and eternal separation from a person’s loved ones. Furthermore, if the only life that existed was the life of this world, death would indeed be the ultimate evil. However, Nursî argues that in …show more content…
He characterizes death as a release from suffering and thus as a blessing from God. Primarily, it discharges humans from the hardships of life which gradually become more difficult with old age. Additionally, it reunites humans with their loved ones who have already entered the intermediate realm of Barzakh. Another blessing of death is that it releases humans from the sufferings and evils of the worldly life. Thirdly, it frees humans from the restrictions of old age and the conditions that make life unbearable. This is because as the body physically deteriorates, it becomes increasingly difficult for humans to function independently. Finally, sleep is a temporary repose from the afflictions of life and thus a mercy for those who suffer. Similarly, death is also a release from the trials of life especially for the anguished. Nursî thus solves the problem of death by reconstructing what makes it problematic and presenting it from a different perspective. He proves that all evil is relative by refashioning the biggest example of human evil, death, to a gift from