Nietzsche's Views On Suffering

Words: 425
Pages: 2

In the outcome causes us suffering, then we have to look at this through a different lens. Nietzsche presents a great counterargument that human displeasure and struggle may not be totally bad after all. That suffering might be a good thing to advance humanity towards a positive direction. set happiness. Suffering has a different function that we are oblivious to in regards to preserving humanity and making us stronger. For example, Nelson Mandela suffered 27 years in prison in resistance to the Apartheid regime in South Africa and after his long struggle he freed his country and became its leader. Sartre supports that philosophy that “man is nothing but what he makes of himself,” (p. 2) that we have the power to shape our lives for the better or worst. Alike, Schopenhauer argued, if one could see others as kindred sufferers, that experience might remind one the most necessary of all things:the tolerance, …show more content…
Nevertheless, one's motives are not entirely animalistic but can work in synch with other spiritual and intellectual motives. Boredom is a form of a trigger which pushes individuals towards action rather than not being an indicator that ones lack appreciation or purpose of life. Human beings evolve based on their needs a physical manifestation which would drive one towards a higher status. Schopenhauer’s arguments are faulty because humans do possess animal instincts that secure one's survival and it is essential for the continuation of the human species. As well, suffering and struggle are necessary for facilitating human physical, mental and intellectual growth. In addition, humans should accept their will to live instead of resisting it as it's like the steering wheel of one's vehicle of life. Accordingly, individuals should exactly do the opposite of what Schopenhauer claims and experience each emotion fully as possible whether it's good or