Night To His Day Judith Lorber Analysis

Words: 651
Pages: 3

The more we read into the articles of Judith Lorber, “Night to His Day’: The Social Construction of Gender” and Claire Renzetti and Daniel Curran, “From Women, Men and Society” we begin to have a deeper understanding of why our society is fixated on “gendering”. From Judith Lorber stating “Gender is so much the routine ground of everyday activities that questioning its taken-for-granted assumptions and presuppositions is like wondering about whether the sun will come up” (335) agrees with Claire Renzetti and Daniel Curran’s idea by them stating that “parents do have different expectations of their babies and treat them differently, simply on the basis of sex” (466). Implicating, they both believe that gender socialization is instantly thought of when thinking of either a male or female. Consequently, our society and culture embodies the idea that sex automatically is associated with certain traits and characteristics, that date back so far, the start of “gendering” so early in a child’s life is practically a natural thought. Judith Lorber’s article explains that everything starts with the perception of an individual being built through cultural or social practices which is shown when she states “The building blocks of gender are socially constructed statuses” (337). She also discusses how because there are social expectations based on social …show more content…
Describing how the idea of the way male and female infants are perceived as controversial in many ways. Therefore, if we associate gender and sex to be a “naturally” linked, which is the center point our society is built on, would our foundation have to be broken in order to revise our thought on what comes “naturally” to