Nike Child Labor

Words: 991
Pages: 4

Recently following the discovery of Nike ’s use of child labor, the corresponding debate involves whether or not it is moral to boycott products that are manufactured by underage workers. In correlation to the profound company’s department from Saga, critics have been focusing on the event to discover both the positive and negative influences of early working. The current situation holds those children living under difficult circumstances while consistently being charged with heavy loads of work. Including the low pay from their contributions, many present liberals and common citizens attempt to deter this “horrific state” by boycotting and promoting education. However, while many assume that this route provides moral support, reality brings …show more content…
Though the ideal solution promotes the abandoning of these goods as a sign of protest, this obstruction may intrude the lives of the children in a critical manner that involves lower payment. Alongside this demotion, the company entailing the use of young employment may go out of business or in a worse scenario, leave the site completely. Holding massive ramifications following the discharge of all contributors, the formerly held positions would waver and lead to more detrimental environments. In the article, it states, “ When the U.S. Congress threatened to ban the import of clothing made by children under 14 in Bangladesh, around 50,000 of them went from their jobs in the relatively clean textile factories to collecting garbage.”(This Company Is Employing Children?, Pg.1) The severity of the consequences is on the verge of being displayed in the struggling company present-day, however, excluding the children, the adult workers will also indefinitely be deprived of their possibly full-time jobs. As the citizens holding responsibility for the threshold of chaos, it is a necessity to consider the aftermath of the actions taken to muse over the possibilities of another …show more content…
In most territories including the United States, the people find early working to be an irregular adaptation as education presides within the highest priorities in a variety of cultures. Due to this, their realization of this “mistreatment” only brought about action in dismay or pity of the children, but while failing to recognize their mishaps and differences in the positions they hold. Though this country is well known and is venerated as a great and active nation, it is still important to grasp the concept that different locations of the world hold altered ideals. In the article by Nadira Faulmuller, it states, “ And even within Western culture, what is seen as a good childhood can vary. Different from other children in the U.S., the Amish are allowed to leave school and start working at around the age of 14.”(This Company Is Employing Children?, Pg.2) Though people may still highlight that the young deserve to earn better, it is visible that the main factor to this conclusion is through the influence of their own social culture. Depending on the separate routes that these landmasses took, the beliefs regarding early employment is majorly disparate and this strongly underlines the arrogance of this