North America's Competitors

Words: 391
Pages: 2

3. Company’s strengths and weaknesses:
Company’s strengths is Balance scorecard: Average 0.83, Market Performance minimum 0.09, Marketing Effectiveness 0.57, Investment in future 1.99, and wealth 0.14.Cumulative balance scorecard: Market performance 0.05, marketing effectiveness 0.52, investment in future 6.44 and wealth of 0.14. Marketing demand for Workhorse of 3, 138 and Market share of 99.7% for Work horse; however, for innovators was the strength in sales revenue was of $631,900, and gross margin of $202,545. For a whole year. North America district Innovators sales number of units sold 115, Sale revenue of $391,000 and Gross Margin of $127,246 making them the powerhouse for North America. For Asia district strongest suit was the Gross Margin of $75,229. For the entire fourth quarter Entire company gross margin was 343,228, operating expense of $941.240. Cumulative investment from Corporate Headquarters of $2,000,000 and net investment (cumulative profit+ cumulative Investment) of $278,584. Return on investment of 14. Which is pretty good.
…show more content…
Cumulative balanced scorecard of total overall zero, and financial performance of -316.95. For the entire year, Innovators Market demand was lower than work horse of 1,097, Market share was the same of 99.7%, Innovators number of Units sold 188, work horse revenue of $611,300, Innovators $412,380 and work horse of $140,638. Sales total for North America district for innovators number of units sold was 115, Work Horse sales revenue $362,100, workhorse gross margin of $72,803. Asia district Innovators number of units sold 73, innovators sales revenue $240,900, and gross margin